COx · DERIVED

COx, the NIRS-based autoregulation index

A fully non-invasive autoregulation index using NIRS rSO2 and MAP slow waves. The neonatal workhorse for SafeBoosC-style preterm CBF management and the pediatric tier-3 ICU.

ReactivityResearchPeds + adultNon-invasiveInvestigational
BLast reviewed 2026-05-1719-min read

1. Bedside vignettes: why this matters in the PICU

Vignette A. The preterm infant on SafeBoosC-style monitoring

A 26-week preterm infant on day 2 of life has continuous bilateral NIRS pads on the frontal cortex (rSO2 target 55 to 85% per SafeBoosC protocol). MAP is 38 mmHg on a low-dose dopamine infusion for borderline hypotension. COx (rolling 5 min) is +0.4, sustained over the last 6 hours; rSO2 is at the lower end of target (58%) and trending down. Autoregulation is impaired and tissue oxygenation is borderline. Action: per SafeBoosC framework, increase MAP target gently with volume or vasopressor titration; reassess COx and rSO2 every 30 min; do not push too high (the upper bound matters in the preterm brain).

Vignette B. Post-cardiac-surgery toddler with discordant COx and clinical exam

An 18-month-old on day 1 after a complex Norwood stage 1 repair, sedated, ventilated. NIRS rSO2 reads 70% bilateral, MAP 55 mmHg, COx = +0.5 sustained, but ICP is not monitored. The bedside platform plots COx-vs-MAP across the last 4 hours: U-curve vertex at MAP 60 (MAPopt 60). Action: gentle MAP escalation (volume or noradrenaline) toward MAP 58 to 63; reassess COx in 30 min. The COx framework here lets the team derive an individualised MAP target without an invasive ICP monitor or sustained TCD.

Vignette C. The septic teenager with discordant COx and PRx

A 15-year-old with septic shock, intubated and sedated, MAP 72 on noradrenaline. ICP monitor in place (placed earlier for confused septic encephalopathy and headache). PRx (bedside ICM+) reads −0.1 (intact); COx reads +0.4 (impaired). The neuropals team discusses: PRx (macrovascular ICP-based) suggests intact autoregulation; COx (tissue-level NIRS) suggests impaired microvascular function consistent with septic microvascular shunting. The discordance is itself informative: it argues for sepsis-specific management (source control, optimisation of oxygen delivery and utilisation) rather than aggressive MAP escalation.


2. What COx is, and what it is not

COx is a moving-window Pearson correlation between the NIRS-derived regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2, %) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg). Computed over the slow-wave band (typically 0.003 to 0.05 Hz) using 10-second averages over a 5-minute rolling window, and updated every 1 minute.

Three concepts to anchor.

COx is a tissue-level autoregulation index. Where PRx uses ICP (an integrated whole-brain pressure signal) and Mx uses TCD MFV (a large-vessel velocity signal), COx uses rSO2 (a tissue-compartment oxygen signal). The three indices share a common physiology (slow-wave correlation captures autoregulatory coupling) but they probe different compartments.

COx is the easiest autoregulation index in pediatrics. NIRS pads are non-invasive, cheap, and widely available in NICU and pediatric ICU. No bolt, no TCD probe, no headframe. The trade-off: rSO2 is a smaller signal than ICP or MFV, more easily corrupted by movement / sweat / hair / extracranial contamination, and reflects only the frontal cortex ~2 to 3 cm deep.

COx interpretation thresholds:

COx valueInterpretation
COx ≤ 0Intact autoregulation
COx 0 to +0.3Borderline / mildly impaired
COx > +0.3Impaired autoregulation
COx > +0.5Severely impaired

Like PRx and Mx, COx generates an COx-vs-MAP U-curve from which MAPopt can be derived.

Clinical pearl

COx is the autoregulation index of the neonatal ICU. Where invasive PRx is rarely placed in preterm and term neonates, NIRS pads are routine and COx can be derived without additional hardware. SafeBoosC-style preterm management has built the largest pediatric autoregulation evidence base from COx-related signals.

In children

Pediatric COx data are more developed than pediatric Mx or PRx data. Brady's piglet model, SafeBoosC trial series, and post-cardiac-surgery pediatric cohorts have established COx as a valid bedside autoregulation index in children and neonates.


3. The signal: COx vs PRx vs Mx

Fig. 1
CEREBRAL OXIMETRY INDEX (COx) · PRETERM INFANTCOx = rolling 5-min correlation(MAP, rSO2) · 4-hour window · impaired when COx > 0.3rSO2 (%)5572MAP (mmHg)38time · 0 to 4 hCOx (rolling 5 min)impaired > 0.30COx approx +0.4 to +0.5COx vs MAP · U-curve25354555MAP (mmHg)+0.8+0.30-0.2MAPopt 38shallow vertex · low confidenceMNM-Edu original schematic · COx = correlation(MAP, rSO2) · illustrative preterm values, not a cited cohort
Cerebral oximetry index (COx) in a preterm infant. COx is the moving correlation between MAP and NIRS cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2): values near zero indicate intact reactivity, values above approximately 0.3 indicate pressure-passive flow. Here MAP drifts below the optimum (MAPopt approximately 38 mmHg) and COx rises to +0.4 to +0.5 as rSO2 falls toward the 55% hypoxic threshold; the COx-vs-MAP plot identifies MAPopt at its nadir.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.

Illustrative teaching values (MNM-Edu schematic), not a single cited cohort. Neonatal cerebral autoregulation is monitored with MAP-based NIRS indices (COx and the haemoglobin volume index, HVx), not ORx, which needs invasive CPP/PbtO2 rarely available in neonates. Optimal MAP clusters approximately 50 to 60 mmHg in term cooled HIE and tracks lower (roughly gestational-age-based) in preterms, where cohort data are sparse. COx, HVx and TOHRx are not numerically interchangeable and no standardised threshold exists; approximately 0.3 is the most common cutoff. Sparse

COx and ORx are related but distinct indices: COx correlates MAP with NIRS rSO2 and is fully non-invasive, the practical choice when no ICP is in place (as in most neonates), whereas ORx correlates CPP (which requires an ICP monitor) with brain-tissue oxygenation or rSO2 and is used in adults who already have ICP.

The three indices have complementary strengths:

IndexSignal sourceCompartment probedBest populations
PRxICP, MAPWhole brain (integrated)Adult TBI, SAH; pediatric severe TBI
MxTCD MFV, CPP or MAPLarge-vessel velocityPatients with sustained TCD; bridges pre / post invasive monitor
COxNIRS rSO2, MAPFrontal cortex tissue (mixed)Neonates, pediatric, ECMO; centres without invasive monitoring

The three can disagree. The most studied disagreement is PRx-COx discordance in sepsis: PRx (intact, macrovascular) while COx (impaired, microvascular) suggests sepsis-related microvascular shunting where the large vessels autoregulate but tissue oxygenation does not. This is informative, not error.


4. The signal: COx computation in detail

The bedside platform requires:

  1. Continuous NIRS rSO2 (typically 1 to 10 Hz sample rate, frontal cortex pad).
  2. Continuous arterial line MAP (100 Hz minimum).
  3. Time-synchronisation between NIRS device and arterial line.
  4. Slow-wave extraction: band-pass filter (0.003 to 0.05 Hz, or 0.01 to 0.05 in neonates with very rapid respiration) on both signals.
  5. Rolling Pearson correlation: 10 s averages over 5 min window, updated every 1 min.
  6. COx-vs-MAP binning: 4 to 6 hours of data; bin MAP into 5 mmHg windows; mean COx per bin; parabolic fit; vertex = MAPopt.
  7. Display: continuous COx trend, MAPopt U-curve, ±5 mmHg target band.

Variants in the NIRS autoregulation family:

  • THx (tissue haemoglobin reactivity): uses NIRS-derived tissue haemoglobin index instead of rSO2.
  • HVx (haemoglobin volume index): uses NIRS-derived oxyHb or total Hb against MAP.

These are conceptually related to COx; the bedside platform (ICM+, Sickbay) typically supports several variants.


5. The numbers: what to record at the bedside

VariableSourceWhat it tells you
COx (rolling 5 min)Bedside platformTissue-level autoregulation, this moment
COx (1 h smoothed)Bedside platformTrend
COx-MAPopt (vertex)Bedside platform fitIndividualised target MAP
Time-in-range (MAPopt ±5)Bedside platformHow well meeting target
NIRS rSO2 (both sides)NIRS deviceTissue oxygenation; pair with COx
NIRS asymmetryNIRS deviceFocal injury check
Concurrent PRx, MxBedside platformMutual validation; discordance check
Signal quality flags (probe contact, artefact)NIRS deviceConfidence in COx

Display COx alongside rSO2 trend, MAP, and (where present) PRx, Mx. The multi-index multimodal view is the modern standard.


6. What is normal? COx interpretation reference

COx valueInterpretationAction
COx ≤ 0IntactContinue current MAP target
COx 0 to +0.1BorderlineContinue, monitor
COx +0.1 to +0.3Mild impairmentTighter MAP control; investigate causes
COx +0.3 to +0.5ImpairedNarrow MAP range; reassess sedation, normothermia, sepsis
COx > +0.5Severely impairedVery narrow MAP range; tissue O2 passive

Pediatric and neonatal data: SafeBoosC-related studies and Brady piglet work support these thresholds; the absolute values are similar to adult.

In children

Preterm and term neonatal COx: NIRS pad fragility, scalp blood flow, fontanelle effects all complicate COx interpretation. The SafeBoosC framework targets rSO2 in a band (55 to 85%) rather than chasing COx, but COx is the underlying physiology that motivates the target.


7. What is abnormal? Pattern library

Fig. 2
COx PATTERN LIBRARYCOx = correlation of NIRS rSO2 with MAP; vertex of the U-curve is MAPopt(a) IntactMAP0COx near 0 with a clean U-curve vertex;MAPopt identifiable.(b) ImpairedMAP0COx +0.4 throughout; U-curve flattened;MAPopt not derivable.(c) Concordant impairedMAP0COx and PRx both > +0.3; strong evidence ofbroken autoregulation.(d) COx impaired, PRx intactMAP0Microvascular shunting (sepsis,mitochondrial); ICP-based PRx says onething, tissue-level COx another.(e) UnreliableMAP0Poor probe contact, sweating, hairinterference; persistent low signal quality.MNM-Edu schematic · mini-plots are schematic, not live data
Five COx patterns. (a) Intact: COx near 0 with clean U-curve vertex; MAPopt identifiable. (b) Impaired: COx +0.4 throughout; U-curve flattened; MAPopt not derivable. (c) COx-PRx concordant impaired: both indices > +0.3; strong evidence of broken autoregulation. (d) COx impaired with PRx intact: microvascular shunting (sepsis, mitochondrial); ICP-based PRx says one thing, tissue-level COx another. (e) COx unreliable: poor probe contact, sweating, hair interference; persistent low signal quality.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.
PatternBedside signatureAction
Intact COxCOx ≤ 0; clean U-curveTarget MAPopt ±5; continue
Impaired COxCOx > +0.3 sustainedNarrow MAP range; reassess sedation, normothermia, oxygen delivery
COx-PRx concordantBoth indices agree (intact or impaired)High confidence
COx impaired, PRx intactDiscordanceInvestigate: sepsis, microvascular shunting, scalp contamination
COx impaired, Mx intactDiscordanceCompartment difference (tissue vs vessel); often technical (NIRS contamination)
COx with no clean U-curveFlat or noisyInsufficient MAP variation; cannot derive MAPopt yet
COx unreliablePersistent low signal qualityRe-prep probe; consider switching to Mx if TCD available
COx improvingFalling COx from +0.5 to 0 over 48 to 72 hRecovery of autoregulation; encouraging

Decision tree: "what does COx tell me?"


8. Try it: interactive widgets

CoxCalculator
Loading widget…

9. COx-driven management decisions

9.1 Preterm and SafeBoosC framework

The flagship pediatric / neonatal autoregulation context. SafeBoosC-II showed feasibility of NIRS-guided rSO2 targeting in preterm infants; SafeBoosC-III (Plomgaard 2024, Hansen 2023) did not demonstrate mortality benefit at 2 years but the framework (rSO2 target band, COx-derived MAPopt support) remains established practice in many neonatal units.

9.2 HIE and post-cardiac arrest

In neonatal HIE, COx (or related NIRS-derived autoregulation indices) provides bedside autoregulation status during the rewarming window and the days that follow. Impaired COx is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcome in some cohorts; the data are evolving.

9.3 Post-cardiac-surgery (CHD)

The post-Norwood / arterial switch / Glenn / Fontan patient is at high risk for cerebral injury. Bilateral NIRS pads are routine; COx adds the autoregulation read; MAP targeting can be individualised by COx-MAPopt in selected centres.

9.4 Pediatric ECMO

COx is well-suited to ECMO because NIRS pads work on the non-pulsatile circulation (where TCD-derived Mx struggles). The ELSO neurological surveillance bundle includes bilateral NIRS; COx is an emerging adjunct.

9.5 Sepsis and microvascular shunting

COx-PRx discordance (COx impaired, PRx intact) is a research-grade signal of microvascular shunting in sepsis. Management implications: avoid aggressive MAP escalation (which does not improve tissue oxygenation in this state); focus on source control, oxygen delivery (Hb, SaO2), and oxygen utilisation (mitochondrial support).

9.6 Pre- and post-monitor windows in TBI / SAH

In a TBI patient awaiting a bolt or after bolt removal, COx provides continuity of autoregulation-guided care, similar to Mx but using NIRS instead of TCD. Particularly useful in centres without TCD capability.

Caveat

Teaching, not protocol. COx interpretation thresholds (>+0.3 impaired) and MAPopt offset (±5 mmHg) are heuristics. The SafeBoosC framework is more established than COx-as-treatment-target. Local protocols and clinical judgment supersede a single COx value. Defer to your unit's senior team for COx-driven decisions, especially in preterm neonates.

Educational algorithm, not a clinical protocol. This walkthrough is a teaching aid. Defer to your unit's pediatric protocols, current PBTF / Kochanek / local guidelines, and your senior clinical team. Doses, thresholds, and decision points are starting points, not prescriptions.

10. Clinical contexts: COx across acute brain injuries

10.1 Severe TBI (pediatric or adult)

Less common indication than PRx or Mx but useful in selected scenarios (pre-bolt placement, post-bolt removal, centres without invasive monitoring). Adult COx data exist (Brady's group, Highland 2014); pediatric data sparse.

10.2 Aneurysmal SAH

COx is less validated in SAH than PRx or Mx but is feasible. Particularly relevant post-monitor-removal or when bedside TCD is intermittent.

10.3 Pediatric AIS

NIRS is part of the post-recanalisation pediatric AIS monitoring bundle; COx is an emerging research adjunct.

10.4 HIE and post-cardiac arrest

COx (and related NIRS autoregulation indices) features in pediatric HIE cohort studies. Lee 2009 reported impaired NIRS-derived autoregulation correlating with worse neurodevelopmental outcome.

10.5 Pediatric ECMO

A natural fit because NIRS pads work on non-pulsatile circulation. ELSO neurological guidelines incorporate bilateral NIRS; COx is the emerging autoregulation adjunct.

10.6 Meningitis and encephalitis

Less established. NIRS adds tissue oxygenation surveillance; COx is an investigational add-on.

10.7 Brain-death determination

Not a brain-death tool. As cerebral circulatory arrest evolves, rSO2 may fall and COx may degenerate; the formal diagnosis remains clinical + apnoea + ancillary per local protocol.

10.8 DKA cerebral oedema

Limited published COx use. Investigational.

10.9 Sepsis and septic encephalopathy

The most physiologically interesting COx context: microvascular shunting can decouple tissue rSO2 from systemic MAP, manifesting as impaired COx with intact PRx. Research interest in using this pattern as a sepsis-specific bedside marker.

10.10 Preterm neonates (SafeBoosC framework)

The leading pediatric NIRS autoregulation context. SafeBoosC-II and -III trials, the field-defining studies. Framework: target rSO2 within a band (55 to 85%); use COx-derived MAPopt as a refinement when reliable.


11. Multimodal integration: COx in the MMM/MNM stack

Pair with…What you gainWorked scenario
PRxMutual validation; PRx-COx discord is informativeSepsis: PRx intact, COx impaired = microvascular shunting
MxTissue (COx) + large-vessel (Mx) autoregulationBoth impaired = high confidence; one impaired = compartment-specific
rSO2 trendThe substrate of COxAsymmetric rSO2 with COx impaired bilaterally = systemic + local
MAP / CPPThe hemodynamic substrateCOx U-curve → MAPopt → BP target
PbtO2Tissue O2 (regional, deep) + tissue rSO2 (frontal, mixed)Discordant signals = compartment artefact or real
Clinical examThe gateExam declining at "good" rSO2 + impaired COx
TCD beyond MxPulsatility (PI) plus tissue oxygenationSepsis: low PI + impaired COx = systemic + tissue stress
aEEG / cEEGCortical electrical activity contextHIE: suppressed aEEG + impaired COx = severe

12. Setup and technique

12.1 Equipment

  • NIRS device: INVOS, FORE-SIGHT, NIRO, or equivalent; bilateral frontal cortex pads.
  • Synchronised arterial line MAP: 100 Hz minimum.
  • Bedside platform: ICM+, Sickbay, custom Python pipeline, or vendor-integrated COx computation.
  • Skin preparation: clean and dry forehead; remove hair if needed; some pads have integrated adhesive.
  • Quiet environment: head movement, scalp pressure changes, and ambient bright light all corrupt NIRS.

12.2 The setup workflow

  1. Place bilateral NIRS pads on the frontal cortex (typically over Fp1 and Fp2 of the 10-20 system).
  2. Verify good signal quality: rSO2 should read stably within 10 seconds; signal-strength indicator should be in the high range.
  3. Confirm MAP recording: calibrated, square-wave test passed.
  4. Confirm time-synchronisation.
  5. Start the rolling COx computation (5 min window, 1 min update).
  6. Display COx, rSO2 (both sides), MAP, and any paired indices (PRx, Mx).

12.3 The COx-MAPopt fit

  1. Collect ≥ 4 hours of data.
  2. Bin MAP into 5 mmHg windows; compute mean COx per bin.
  3. Fit a parabola.
  4. Vertex = MAPopt.
  5. Target MAP within ±5 mmHg of MAPopt.
  6. Re-fit every 1 to 4 hours.

12.4 Quality control

  • Pad contact: re-secure or re-prep every 12 to 24 h; signal quality drifts.
  • Scalp blood flow contamination: a common confounder; the NIRS algorithms attempt to subtract but are imperfect.
  • Sweating and hair: cause signal degradation; clean and re-secure as needed.
  • Movement artefact: in unsedated children especially; flag and exclude affected epochs.
  • Document quality with every COx report.

12.5 Pediatric / neonatal specific tips

  • Small pads for neonates; the larger adult pads do not contact well on small foreheads.
  • Fontanelle: open fontanelle alters depth of NIRS signal; calibrate within centre.
  • Scalp blood flow is high in neonates; extracranial contamination is a recognised confounder.
  • SafeBoosC training: NICUs running SafeBoosC-style protocols typically have formal NIRS training; COx is an emerging adjunct.

12.6 When COx is not the right tool

  • Persistent poor signal quality: hair, sweat, head trauma, scalp burn; pause interpretation.
  • Inadequate MAP variation: no MAPopt fit possible.
  • Heavy scalp contamination: rSO2 dominated by extracranial blood flow; cortical signal lost.
  • Pre-arrest state: rSO2 falls precipitously; COx becomes uninterpretable.

13. Pitfalls

  • Extracranial contamination: scalp blood flow contributes to rSO2; COx may reflect peripheral haemodynamics more than cortical.
  • Frontal cortex only: COx samples ~2 to 3 cm depth in frontal cortex; says nothing about deep brain, posterior fossa, or contralateral hemisphere.
  • Mixed venous-arterial compartment: rSO2 is ~75% venous, ~25% arterial; not pure tissue oxygen tension.
  • Pad failure: poor contact, signal drift, drop-out; check quality continuously.
  • Persistent low signal quality: do not interpret COx; consider alternative autoregulation index.
  • Discordance with PRx interpreted as error: sepsis-related microvascular shunting is a real physiology, not an artefact.
  • Single-snapshot COx: trend over hours is the signal.
  • Pediatric / neonatal COx normative ranges: still emerging; adult thresholds may not directly apply.
  • SafeBoosC ≠ COx targeting: SafeBoosC targets rSO2 within a band, not COx; the COx framework is the underlying physiology but the bedside protocol is rSO2-based.
  • MAPopt validity in low MAP variation: the U-curve fit is unreliable when MAP has not swung across enough of its range; needs hours of natural variation.

14. Combine with…

  • NIRS: the parent modality; COx is one of its derived indices.
  • PRx: the invasive autoregulation sibling.
  • Mx: the TCD-based non-invasive autoregulation sibling.
  • CPP: the upstream hemodynamic variable.
  • CPPopt: the dedicated CPPopt page; COx-MAPopt is the NIRS-based variant.
  • Foundations: autoregulation: the underlying physiology.
  • Advanced NIRS: DCS and TR-NIRS as emerging absolute CBF tools.

15. Evidence summary

TopicSourceGrade
Brady piglet validation of NIRS autoregulation B
COx original descriptionB
Lee 2009 NIRS autoregulation in HIEC
Rivera-Lara autoregulation reviewreview
Pediatric NIRS reference data C
SafeBoosC-II feasibilityB
SafeBoosC-III 2-year follow-upA
SafeBoosC-III primary resultsA
Pediatric post-arrest brain injuryreview
Pediatric BTF (TBI)expert
Pediatric MMM consensus expert
ELSO neurological guidelinesexpert
PRx (the comparison index)A
Mx (the comparison index)B
Aries CPPoptB
Donnelly MAPoptB
Oddo 2017 NIRS in strokeC

16. Recent literature (2022 to 2025)

  • Plomgaard 2024 SafeBoosC-III primary results: did not show mortality benefit at 36 weeks for rSO2-guided preterm care vs standard care; framework remains established in many units.
  • Hansen 2023 SafeBoosC-III 2-year follow-up: confirmed no significant outcome difference at 2 years.
  • Naim 2023 pediatric post-arrest brain injury: NIRS / COx as part of multimodal post-arrest framework.
  • Helbok 2024 pediatric MMM: COx as an accessible pediatric autoregulation index in resource-stratified centres.
  • Figaji 2025 pediatric MMM consensus: positions COx alongside PRx and Mx in the pediatric MNM autoregulation triad.
  • Continued NIRS device evolution: time-resolved NIRS, frequency-domain NIRS, and DCS expand the NIRS family with absolute CBF and tissue oxygenation indices.

17. Self-check

Retrieval check
A 26-week preterm infant on day 2 of life has bilateral frontal NIRS pads with rSO2 target 55 to 85% per SafeBoosC. MAP 38, rSO2 58% (lower end of target, falling), COx +0.4 sustained over 6 h. Most appropriate next step?
A 15-year-old with septic shock, intubated and sedated, MAP 72 on noradrenaline, ICP monitor in place. PRx −0.1 (intact), COx +0.4 (impaired). Best interpretation?
An 18-month-old, day 1 after Norwood stage 1 cardiac repair, sedated and ventilated. NIRS rSO2 70% bilateral, MAP 55, no ICP monitor. Bedside platform plots COx-vs-MAP across last 4 h; U-curve vertex at MAP 60 (MAPopt 60). Current COx +0.5 sustained. Best action?

References

  1. Brady KM, Lee JK, Kibler KK, et al.. NIRS-based cerebrovascular reactivity (ORx) in adult clinical TBI and SAH cohorts. Neurocritical Care 2010.
  2. Lee JK, Kibler KK, Benni PB, et al.. Cerebrovascular reactivity measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Stroke 2009;40(5):1820-1826.
  3. Plomgaard AM, Hyttel-Sørensen S, Greisen G. SafeBoosC-III: NIRS oximetry-guided management in extremely preterm infants, five-year follow-up. Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2024.
  4. Hyttel-Sørensen S, Pellicer A, Alderliesten T, et al. (SafeBoosC Trial Group). Cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry in extremely preterm infants: phase II randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2015;350:g7635.
  5. Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Hyttel-Sørensen S, et al. (SafeBoosC-III Trial Group). Cerebral oximetry monitoring in extremely preterm infants. NEJM 2023;388(16):1501–1511. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207554 link
  6. Naim MY, Friess SH, Sutton RM, et al.. Multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric post-cardiac-arrest care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  7. Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebral autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology 2017;126(6):1187-1199.
  8. Brady KM, Lee JK, Kibler KK, et al.. Continuous measurement of autoregulation by spontaneous fluctuations in cerebral perfusion pressure: comparison of 3 methods. Stroke 2007;38(11):2818–2825.
  9. Brady KM, Mytar JO, Lee JK, et al.. Brain-induced hyperemia: a piglet model of cerebral autoregulation. Anesthesiology 2009.
  10. Topjian AA, Scholefield BR, Pinto NP, et al.. Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation 2021;144(13):e194-e233.
  11. Lorusso R, Taccone FS, Belliato M, et al.. Brain monitoring in adult and pediatric ECMO patients: the importance of early and late assessments. Minerva Anestesiologica 2017;83(10):1061-1074.
  12. Cho SM, Ziai W, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebrovascular events in ECMO survivors: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  13. LaRovere KL, Vonberg FW, Prabhu SP, et al.. Patterns of head computed tomography abnormalities during pediatric ECMO and association with outcomes. Pediatric Neurology 2017;73:64-70.
  14. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al.. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition (PBTF/SCCM). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(3S):S1-S82.
  15. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al.. Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023;54(7):e314-e370.
  16. Rass V, Helbok R. How to diagnose delayed cerebral ischaemia and symptomatic vasospasm and prevent cerebral infarction in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2021;27(2):103-114.
  17. Ferriero DM, Fullerton HJ, Bernard TJ, et al.. Management of stroke in neonates and children: a scientific statement from the AHA/ASA. Stroke 2019;50(3):e51-e96.
  18. Sun LR, Wilson JL, Waak M, et al.. Thrombectomy in pediatric acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Neurology 2020;105:11-19.
  19. Kirschen MP, Majmudar T, Beaulieu F, et al.. Transcranial Doppler in pediatric cardiac arrest survivors, association with neurologic outcome. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2020;21(5):e221-e229.
  20. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al.. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008;47(3):303-327.
  21. van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O, et al.. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2016;22 Suppl 3:S37-S62.
  22. Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, et al.. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Critical Care Medicine 2011;39(9):2139-2155.
  23. Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
  24. Glaser N, Kuppermann N. Cerebral injury in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis: mechanisms, prevention, and current research. Pediatric Diabetes 2024.
  25. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  26. Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  27. Tasker RC, LaRovere KL, Riviello JJ, et al.. Pediatric multimodal neuromonitoring: international Delphi consensus. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  28. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al.. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Intensive Care Medicine 2014;40(9):1189-1209.
  29. Davies DJ, Su Z, Clancy MT, et al.. Near-infrared spectroscopy in the monitoring of adult traumatic brain injury: a review. Journal of Neurotrauma 2015;32(13):933-941.
  30. Andresen B, Greisen G, Hyttel-Sorensen S. Comparison of INVOS 5100C and Nonin SenSmart X-100 oximeter performance in preterm infants with spontaneous apnea. Pediatric Research 2014;79:466-472.
  31. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery 1997;41(1):11–17.
  32. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke 1996;27(10):1829–1834.
  33. Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al.. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Critical Care Medicine 2012;40(8):2456-2463.
  34. Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Adams H, et al.. Individualizing thresholds of cerebral perfusion pressure using estimated limits of autoregulation. Critical Care Medicine 2017;45(9):1464-1471.
  35. Oddo M, Bösel J. Monitoring of Brain and Systemic Oxygenation in Neurocritical Care Patients. Neurocritical Care 2014;21(Suppl 2):S103–120. doi:10.1007/s12028-014-0024-6 link
  36. Lovett ME, O'Brien NF. Comprehensive review of pediatric noninvasive cerebral and cerebrovascular monitoring. Pediatric Neurology 2022.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.