CPP · DERIVED

Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)

CPP = MAP − ICP. The number, the path, and why two patients with the same CPP can have very different brains. Age-banded minima, individualised CPPopt, and the harms of pushing CPP too high.

PressureBedsidePeds + adultInvasiveValidated
ALast reviewed 2026-05-1720-min read

1. Bedside vignettes: why this matters in the PICU

Vignette A. The 14-year-old SAH, "good CPP" after hyperosmolar therapy

A 14-year-old presents with WFNS grade 3 SAH after a ruptured aneurysm. After coiling, ICP is 18 mmHg, MAP 95, CPP 77. Six hours later, ICP rises to 20 mmHg. The team gives 3% saline; MAP rises to 110 in response to volume expansion; new ICP 20 mmHg; new CPP 90 mmHg. The team notes that PRx has crept to +0.4 over the same window. The autoregulation curve has been pushed above the upper limit: the higher MAP has not translated into useful brain perfusion (autoregulation broken), and the higher CPP risks hyperperfusion, oedema, and a PRESS-like picture. Action: lower MAP target to bring CPP back to 65 to 75, recheck PRx in 1 hour.

Vignette B. The 4-month-old after non-accidental head injury

A 4-month-old infant arrives in shock with non-accidental head injury, retinal haemorrhages, and a tense fontanelle. After resuscitation, MAP 50, ICP 18, CPP 32. The pediatric BTF age-banded CPP minimum for an infant is 40 to 50 mmHg. Action: raise MAP gently to 60 to 65 (fluid + noradrenaline if needed), reassess CPP, treat ICP if it climbs further. Within 30 min, MAP 62, ICP 18, CPP 44, in the lower band of the age target. The combination of age-appropriate CPP targeting plus ICP management is the bedside framework.

Vignette C. The 12-year-old TBI, the CPPopt is below the textbook target

A 12-year-old severe TBI is on day 4 with ICP 16, MAP 80, CPP 64. The PRx-vs-CPP continuous fit (computed from 4 hours of data by the bedside ICM+) shows a U-curve with minimum PRx at CPP 58. This patient's CPPopt is 58, below the standard "60 to 70 for older child" textbook target. Aggressive MAP escalation to push CPP to 70 would shift this child to the right of his CPPopt, where PRx becomes more positive (impaired autoregulation, hyperperfusion). Action: target MAP to keep CPP near 58 to 63; reassess CPPopt every 1 to 4 hours. This is the central idea of individualised CPPopt: the textbook number is a starting heuristic; the U-curve is the truth.


2. What CPP is, and what it is not

CPP is a derived number computed from two measured numbers. The two measured numbers are mean arterial pressure (from an arterial line) and intracranial pressure (from an EVD or parenchymal monitor). The derivation:

CPP=MAPICP\mathrm{CPP} = \mathrm{MAP} - \mathrm{ICP}

Three things follow immediately.

CPP is not cerebral blood flow. CPP is the driving pressure across the cerebral vascular bed. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) depends on CPP and on cerebrovascular resistance (CVR), through Ohm's law:

CBF=CPPCVR\mathrm{CBF} = \frac{\mathrm{CPP}}{\mathrm{CVR}}

If autoregulation is intact, CVR adjusts so that CBF is roughly constant across a wide range of CPP (the Lassen plateau). If autoregulation is broken, CBF tracks CPP linearly. Same CPP, very different CBF in these two cases.

Same CPP, different paths. CPP 60 from MAP 75 + ICP 15 is a healthy brain on the autoregulation plateau. CPP 60 from MAP 100 + ICP 40 is a brain with markedly raised ICP and a high-MAP "compensation"; the cerebrovascular bed is exposed to high transmural pressure, the systemic circulation is under stress, and the autoregulation may be impaired. The path matters; the same number is not the same physiology.

CPP minima are age-banded. The mature cerebral autoregulation plateau (CPP 60 to 150 in adults) does not exist in the same form in young children. Neonates have a much narrower and lower autoregulation plateau (CPP ~30 to 50). The age-banded minimum CPP targets from the pediatric BTF guidelines:

AgeCPP minimum (mmHg)Source
Term neonate35 to 40Pediatric BTF / Tasker 2023
1 to 12 months40 to 50Pediatric BTF
1 to 5 years50 to 60Pediatric BTF
6 to 12 years60 to 70Pediatric BTF / adult-like
Adolescent / adult60 to 70Pediatric BTF (treat ICP > 20); adult BTF treats > 22
Clinical pearl

CPP is not a treatment goal in isolation. It is one number on a triangle with MAP and ICP. The path to CPP matters. The age-banded minimum is a floor, not a target. Individualised CPPopt is the modern refinement that personalises the target.

In children

Pediatric autoregulation plateau is narrower and lower than adult. A neonate with MAP 30 is potentially below the lower limit of autoregulation; the same MAP in an adult is dangerously low for a different reason. Always reach for the age-band table before reading a single CPP value.


3. The CPP triangle and the underlying physiology

Fig. 1
THE CPP TRIANGLE: CPP = MAP - ICPthe same CPP 60 is reachable from many MAP / ICP pairsCPP = 60 (same)healthy (lower-MAP path)CPP 60ICP 15MAP 75decompensated (high-ICP path)CPP 60ICP 40MAP 100020406080100120pressure (mmHg)Lassen plateau: MAP within this band does not change CBFCPP (effective perfusion)ICP (opposes MAP)MNM-Edu schematic · Lassen 1959, Aries 2012
The CPP triangle. CPP = MAP − ICP. The same CPP value (e.g., 60 mmHg, shown by the dotted line) is reachable by many MAP/ICP combinations: MAP 75 with ICP 15 (healthy brain, lower-MAP path) vs MAP 100 with ICP 40 (decompensated brain, high-ICP / high-MAP compensation path). The two paths have very different implications for the cerebrovascular bed, the systemic circulation, and the management plan. The Lassen autoregulation plateau is the green band along the MAP axis: MAP changes within the plateau do not change CBF; changes outside it do.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.

The classical Lassen autoregulation curve plots CBF on the y-axis against CPP (or MAP) on the x-axis. In a healthy adult, CBF is roughly constant from CPP ~60 to ~150 mmHg (the plateau). Below the lower limit (LLA), CBF falls and ischaemia ensues. Above the upper limit (ULA), CBF rises and hyperaemia / breakthrough oedema ensues.

Three modifications matter clinically.

The plateau is narrower and lower in children. Neonates: roughly CPP 30 to 50. Toddlers: roughly CPP 40 to 70. School-age: closer to adult. The exact bounds vary by individual, by injury, by sedation depth, and by autoregulation status. The age-banded minima above are empirical (from observational pediatric TBI data) rather than physiological.

Acute brain injury narrows or abolishes the plateau. PRx > +0.3, Mx > +0.3, or COx > +0.3 mean autoregulation is impaired; CBF tracks CPP passively in that range; the patient is functionally outside the plateau. Pushing CPP up does not produce useful CBF, and may produce oedema.

Individualised CPPopt (Aries 2012, Donnelly 2017, Beqiri 2024 COGiTATE): plot PRx against CPP across the previous 4 hours of data; fit a parabola; the vertex is CPPopt. Target the CPP within ±5 mmHg of CPPopt. In adult TBI, time spent further from CPPopt correlates with worse outcome (Aries 2012, Beqiri 2024).


4. The numbers: what to record at the bedside

VariableSourceWhat it tells you
MAPArterial lineDriving pressure side of the equation
ICPEVD or parenchymal probeResistance side of the equation
CPPDerived: MAP − ICPNet driving pressure
PRxICM+ or bedside autoregulation monitorAutoregulation status; underpins CPPopt
CPPoptICM+ continuous fitIndividualised target
Time-in-range (CPPopt ±5)ICM+ summary statisticHow well you are meeting CPPopt
Hemodynamic context (HR, CVP, vasopressor dose)BedsidePath to the current MAP

Document trend over hours, not single snapshots. Most modern PICU bedside platforms show CPP alongside MAP, ICP, and PRx in one trend strip.


5. What is normal? Age-banded CPP targets

AgeCPP minimum (mmHg)Typical "comfortable" target (mmHg)Source
Term neonate35 to 4040 to 50Pediatric BTF
1 to 12 months40 to 5050 to 60Pediatric BTF
1 to 5 years50 to 6060 to 65Pediatric BTF
6 to 12 years60 to 7065 to 75Pediatric BTF
Adolescent / adult60 to 7060 to 75BTF / TBI bundle

.

In children

Age-banded minima are floors, not targets. A 6-year-old with CPP 50 needs intervention; a 6-year-old with CPP 65 is on target. The minima exist because below them, observed pediatric outcomes are clearly worse. Individualised CPPopt (when available) refines the target further.


6. What is abnormal? Pattern library and management triggers

Fig. 2
CPP PATTERN LIBRARYCPP = MAP - ICP; read the bar, the PRx, and the action together(a) NormalMAP 77 = ICP 12 + CPP 65 (mmHg)12CPP 65PRx-0.1Action: autoregulation intact; continue(b) Low CPPMAP 67 = ICP 22 + CPP 45 (mmHg)22CPP 45PRx+0.4Action: lower ICP and raise MAP; recheck PRx(c) High CPPMAP 108 = ICP 18 + CPP 90 (mmHg)18CPP 90PRx+0.5Action: lower MAP; pushing higher will damage(d) CPPopt mismatchCPPopt 58CPP 70CPP (textbook)70CPPopt (fit)58PRx+0.3Action: lower MAP to bring CPP to 58 to 63MNM-Edu schematic
Four CPP patterns. (a) Normal: CPP 65 in an 8-year-old, ICP 12, MAP 77, PRx −0.1 (autoregulation intact). (b) Low CPP: CPP 45, ICP 22, MAP 67, PRx +0.4. Action: lower ICP and raise MAP; recheck PRx. (c) High CPP: CPP 90, ICP 18, MAP 108, PRx +0.5. Action: lower MAP; pushing higher will damage. (d) CPPopt mismatch: CPP 70 (textbook), PRx +0.3, but the U-curve fit shows CPPopt 58. Action: lower MAP to bring CPP to 58 to 63.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.
PatternBedside signatureAction
Normal CPP, PRx intactCPP within age band, PRx < 0Continue
Low CPP from high ICPCPP < age minimum, ICP > threshold, normal MAPTreat ICP first (sedation, HOB, hyperosmolar)
Low CPP from low MAPCPP < age minimum, MAP low, ICP normalTreat MAP (volume, vasopressor)
High CPP from high MAPCPP > 80 (older child), PRx becoming positiveLower MAP gently
High CPP from very high ICPCPP "ok" but ICP > 25, MAP > 110 (compensation)Treat ICP urgently; the path is bad
CPPopt mismatchCPP within textbook range but PRx risingRe-fit CPPopt; target the individualised number
Impaired autoregulationPRx > +0.3 sustainedNarrow the CPP range; consider sedation, normothermia, normocapnia

Decision tree: "what to do about this CPP"


7. Try it: interactive widgets

CPPTriangle
Loading widget…
CPPoptUCurve
Loading widget…

8. CPP-driven management in detail

8.1 Fixed thresholds (BTF / pediatric BTF)

The simplest CPP framework. Maintain CPP above the age-banded minimum at all times. Treat ICP above 20 mmHg (guideline, all pediatric ages; emerging paediatric data point lower). The pediatric BTF 4th edition is the canonical reference.

8.2 The ICP-dose framework

Guiza 2015 and Depreitere 2014 introduced the concept of ICP dose: the area-under-curve of ICP × time above threshold, which correlates with outcome better than peak ICP alone. The corollary CPP dose: time spent below CPP minimum × magnitude of the deficit also correlates with outcome. The dose framework integrates the trade-off between treating ICP and maintaining CPP.

8.3 Individualised CPPopt

Compute PRx (or Mx, or COx) continuously. Plot PRx against CPP for the last 4 hours; fit a parabola. The vertex is CPPopt; target MAP so CPP sits within ±5 mmHg of CPPopt. Re-fit every 1 to 4 hours.

Pediatric data: Tas 2024 reported pediatric CPPopt feasibility in 50 children with severe TBI; time spent further from CPPopt correlated with worse outcome, consistent with adult data.

8.4 The risk of pushing CPP too high

Three named harms:

  1. ARDS / lung injury: aggressive fluid and vasopressor escalation to lift MAP increases lung-injury risk. The original CPP-targeted protocols (CPP > 70 in adults) were abandoned partly for this reason.
  2. Cerebral hyperaemia and oedema: if autoregulation is broken, raising MAP pushes CBF up linearly; the resulting hyperaemia can cause vasogenic oedema, breakthrough bleeding, and worsen ICP.
  3. PRESS-like syndrome: posterior reversible encephalopathy can be precipitated by hypertension, particularly in conditions with endothelial dysfunction (sepsis, eclampsia, post-transplant).

The upper bound matters. Modern CPP management is two-sided: too low is bad, too high is also bad.

8.5 The bedside MAP-titration ladder

When CPP needs to be raised:

  1. Fluid bolus (10 to 20 mL/kg crystalloid) if hypovolaemic; recheck CPP in 15 min.
  2. Vasopressor (noradrenaline, sometimes phenylephrine; vasopressin in selected cases): start low, titrate to MAP target.
  3. Sedation review: deep sedation can cause hypotension; review and adjust.
  4. Posture: head-of-bed at 30°; abdominal compression / Valsalva avoided; jugular venous outflow unobstructed.
  5. Reassess CPP after each step.

When CPP needs to be lowered:

  1. Lower MAP target: titrate vasopressor down; use esmolol or labetalol if MAP needs more decisive control.
  2. Address sympathetic surge: increase sedation if pain or agitation is driving MAP up.
  3. Reassess autoregulation index (PRx, Mx, COx) to confirm pushing CPP back into the plateau.

8.6 When CPP and ICP are both stubbornly out of range

The path matters. If ICP is the problem (sustained ICP above the guideline threshold of 20 mmHg, all ages, despite first-line measures), escalate ICP management (deeper sedation, hyperosmolar, possibly hypothermia, possibly decompressive craniectomy). Raising MAP alone in this setting often raises ICP further (autoregulation broken; volume goes to brain not vessel). If MAP is the problem (sepsis, haemorrhagic shock), restore MAP first; ICP often improves as cerebral perfusion is restored.

Caveat

Teaching, not protocol. CPP thresholds (60 to 70 older child, 50 to 60 toddler, etc.) and CPPopt offset (±5 mmHg) are heuristics derived from observational data. Local protocols, age-specific evidence, and individual patient context always govern. Defer to your unit's senior intensivist and neurosurgical team for CPP-driven decisions.

Educational algorithm, not a clinical protocol. This walkthrough is a teaching aid. Defer to your unit's pediatric protocols, current PBTF / Kochanek / local guidelines, and your senior clinical team. Doses, thresholds, and decision points are starting points, not prescriptions.

9. Clinical contexts: CPP across acute brain injuries

9.1 Severe TBI

The canonical indication. Pediatric BTF specifies age-banded CPP minima; the consensus statements (Kochanek 2019, Tasker 2023) emphasise that "ICP and CPP are both important" rather than a single number. Multimodal monitoring (ICP, PRx, PbtO2 where available) refines the CPP target.

9.2 Aneurysmal SAH

Post-SAH CPP management balances vasospasm prevention (higher MAP supports collateral flow) against bleeding risk and the upper limit of autoregulation. AHA SAH guidelines suggest maintaining CPP and MAP within an individualised, multimodal framework.

9.3 Pediatric AIS

Post-recanalisation hyperperfusion risk drives MAP-lowering decisions in the first 24 h. CPP per se is less the bedside framework here; MAP control with NIRS / TCD feedback is more relevant.

9.4 HIE and post-cardiac arrest

Pediatric post-arrest CPP targets are not well-defined. AHA pediatric post-arrest guidelines suggest age-appropriate MAP targets, avoidance of hypotension, and avoidance of hyperthermia. Autoregulation indices (where available) refine the target.

9.5 Pediatric ECMO

VA-ECMO patients have continuous MAP; CPP is a meaningful number even without pulsatility. The ELSO neurological guidelines recommend MAP-targeted care with neuromonitoring (NIRS, NPi, cEEG); explicit CPP targets are centre-dependent.

9.6 Meningitis and encephalitis with raised ICP

Bacterial meningitis with fulminant cerebral oedema can require ICP / CPP management akin to TBI. Pediatric meningitis guidelines reference CPP only in the context of overall ICP / oedema management.

9.7 Brain-death determination

CPP approaches or falls to zero in established brain death (ICP approaches MAP); TCD shows oscillating / pendular flow patterns. CPP is not a diagnostic criterion but is a useful corroborating bedside observation.

9.8 DKA cerebral oedema

ICP rises during DKA-CO; CPP falls. Maintaining age-appropriate CPP during rehydration is part of the bedside management bundle alongside osmotherapy and HOB.

9.9 Refractory status epilepticus

Continuous sedation for refractory SE can hypotensify and lower CPP. The PICU framework targets MAP and CPP within age-appropriate ranges while treating the seizure burden; vasopressor support is common.


10. Multimodal integration: CPP in the MMM/MNM stack

Pair with…What you gainWorked scenario
ICPThe two numbers that compose CPP; treat the pathHigh ICP + low CPP: treat ICP first, then MAP
PRx / Mx / COxAutoregulation status drives CPPoptPRx U-curve fit gives the individualised target
PbtO2Tissue oxygenation at the same site; complements CPPLow PbtO2 at "good" CPP: mitochondrial dysfunction; do not raise MAP
TCDMx as the non-invasive autoregulation surrogateTCD shows MFV tracks MAP: passive flow; below LLA
NIRSrSO2 and COx as the tissue-oxygenation complementsrSO2 stable at CPP 60 = autoregulation intact
Clinical examThe gate; falling exam at "good" CPP triggers reassessmentGCS drops with stable CPP: image and reassess
MicrodialysisCortical biochemistry confirms or refutes ischaemic CPP pictureL/P rising with low CPP confirms ischaemia

11. Setup and technique

11.1 Measuring MAP correctly

  1. Arterial line with a properly zeroed transducer at the phlebostatic axis.
  2. Calibrate with mercury or per local protocol at start of shift.
  3. Square-wave test to verify under- / over-damping; correct if abnormal.
  4. Document MAP at consistent timestamps; the rolling 1-minute average is the standard input to PRx / CPPopt computation.

11.2 Measuring ICP correctly

  1. EVD or parenchymal probe placed by neurosurgery per local protocol.
  2. Zeroing: EVD transducer at the tragus (foramen of Monro); parenchymal probes pre-calibrated and inserted.
  3. Verify trace quality: clean P1-P2-P3 morphology, respiratory variation visible.
  4. Document at consistent timestamps; pair with MAP.

11.3 Computing CPP and CPPopt

  1. Continuous CPP = MAP − ICP, computed beat-to-beat or every 1 to 10 s.
  2. PRx computation: Pearson correlation of 10-s averages of ICP and MAP over a rolling 5-min window.
  3. CPPopt computation: bin CPP values from the last 4 h into 5-mmHg windows; compute mean PRx in each bin; fit a parabola; the vertex is CPPopt.
  4. Display: bedside platform (ICM+, Sickbay, or custom) shows CPP, PRx, and CPPopt as a continuous trend.

11.4 The bedside conversation

  1. Morning round: review the previous 24 h CPP, ICP, MAP, PRx, CPPopt trend.
  2. Define the CPP target for the day: age-banded minimum OR individualised CPPopt OR multimodal-derived target.
  3. Define the action triggers: CPP below X for Y min → escalate; CPP above Z with rising PRx → de-escalate.
  4. Document the plan so the night team can act consistently.

11.5 Pediatric-specific considerations

  1. Age-banded targets mandatory; do not apply adult CPP 60 to 70 to an infant.
  2. Lower stroke volume, so MAP responses to volume vary; intermittent boluses more useful than large continuous infusions.
  3. Vasopressor selection: noradrenaline first-line for most pediatric CPP escalations; dopamine has fallen out of first-line use in many units.
  4. Pediatric CPPopt evidence is sparse: treat the individualised target as a refinement of the age-banded floor, not a replacement.

11.6 Calibration drift and signal quality

CPP and CPPopt are only as good as the underlying MAP and ICP signals. Daily transducer zeroing, regular square-wave testing, and prompt response to alarms (ICP probe drift, EVD over-drainage, arterial line damping) are operational essentials.


12. Pitfalls

  • CPP without context: same CPP, different paths; always document the MAP / ICP split and the autoregulation status.
  • Treating CPP as the only goal: chasing CPP > 70 in an older child can cause ARDS / hyperaemic injury.
  • Applying adult thresholds to children: a CPP of 50 is "low" in an adult but appropriate in a toddler.
  • CPPopt without enough data: 4 hours of synchronised MAP / ICP / PRx are needed; less is unreliable.
  • CPPopt during sedation changes: sedation hold can artefact the CPPopt fit for an hour.
  • Ignoring autoregulation status: a "good" CPP in a patient with PRx +0.5 is not the same as a "good" CPP in a patient with PRx −0.1.
  • Single-snapshot CPP: trend over hours matters more than a one-off number.
  • Confusing CPP and CBF: CPP is the driving pressure; CBF depends on CVR; the two move together only when autoregulation is broken.
  • Forgetting the upper bound: pediatric BTF gives a minimum but not a strict maximum; in practice, CPP > 85 in an older child should be questioned.
  • Path-of-care confusion: CPP can be raised by raising MAP or by lowering ICP; the chosen path matters for the brain and the patient.

13. Combine with…

  • ICP: one of the two measured numbers that compose CPP.
  • PRx: the autoregulation index that underpins CPPopt.
  • CPPopt: the dedicated CPPopt page with workflow detail.
  • Mx: TCD-derived autoregulation index for non-invasive CPPopt.
  • COx: NIRS-derived autoregulation index.
  • PbtO2: tissue-oxygen complement.
  • Foundations: autoregulation: the physiology behind every CPP target.

14. Evidence summary

TopicSourceGrade
Original CPP conceptfoundational
BTF severe TBI guidelinesexpert
Pediatric BTF 4th editionexpert
Pediatric PCCM reviewreview
Aries CPPopt originalB
Donnelly MAP-opt extensionB
ICP / CPP dose B
COGiTATE feasibility trialA
Pediatric CPPopt feasibility (Tas 2024)C
PRx originalA
Pediatric MMM consensus expert
LeRoux 2014 multimodal consensusexpert
SAH AHA guidelinesexpert
Pediatric stroke guidelinesexpert
Pediatric post-arrest AHAexpert
Pediatric autoregulation reviewreview

15. Recent literature (2022 to 2025)

  • Beqiri 2024 COGiTATE trial: randomised feasibility trial of CPPopt-guided MAP management vs standard care in adult TBI; CPPopt arm achieved more time within ±5 mmHg of target with acceptable safety.
  • Tas 2024 pediatric CPPopt feasibility: largest pediatric CPPopt cohort to date (n = 50 severe TBI); CPPopt computable and clinically actionable in pediatric ICU.
  • Tas 2025 COGiTATE follow-up: longer-term outcomes data emerging.
  • Tasker 2023 PCCM review: pediatric severe TBI management framework integrating CPP, CPPopt, multimodal monitoring.
  • Figaji 2025 pediatric MMM consensus: positions CPPopt as tier-2 (specialist centre) modality in pediatric MNM.
  • Helbok 2024 pediatric MMM: bedside operationalisation of CPP / CPPopt in pediatric multimodal stacks.

16. Self-check

Retrieval check
A 14-year-old SAH after coiling. Baseline ICP 18, MAP 95, CPP 77, PRx +0.1. After 3% saline, MAP rises to 110 in volume response; new ICP 20, new CPP 90; new PRx +0.4. Best interpretation and action?
A 4-month-old infant after non-accidental head injury. After resuscitation, MAP 50, ICP 18, CPP 32. The team applies the adult CPP target of 60 to 70 and starts noradrenaline to push MAP to 90. ICP rises to 25 within 30 min. Best interpretation?
A 12-year-old severe TBI on day 4. ICP 16, MAP 80, CPP 64. The bedside ICM+ shows a PRx-vs-CPP U-curve fit over the last 4 h with the vertex at CPP 58 (CPPopt 58 mmHg). Current PRx is +0.3 at CPP 64. Best interpretation and action?

References

  1. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al.. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition (PBTF/SCCM). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(3S):S1-S82.
  2. Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al.. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Critical Care Medicine 2012;40(8):2456-2463.
  3. Tas J, Smielewski P, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Tasker RC. Feasibility of pediatric CPPopt monitoring in severe TBI. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024.
  4. Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Adams H, et al.. Individualizing thresholds of cerebral perfusion pressure using estimated limits of autoregulation. Critical Care Medicine 2017;45(9):1464-1471.
  5. Tasker RC. Cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: a review. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  6. Depreitere B, Guiza F, Van den Berghe G, et al.. Pressure autoregulation monitoring and CPP target recommendation in patients with severe TBI based on minute-by-minute monitoring data. Journal of Neurosurgery 2014;120(6):1451-1457.
  7. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al.. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. NEJM 2012;367(26):2471-2481.
  8. Lassen NA. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiological Reviews 1959;39(2):183–238. doi:10.1152/physrev.1959.39.2.183 link
  9. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery 1997;41(1):11–17.
  10. Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C, Czosnyka M, et al.. Feasibility of individualised severe TBI management using a CPPopt approach: COGiTATE phase II trial. Intensive Care Medicine 2021;47:1093-1103.
  11. Agrawal S, Bögli SY, O'Donnell R, et al.. Intracranial Pressure Treatment Thresholds in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Pediatrics 2026;180(6):650-658. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.0197 link
  12. Guiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, et al.. Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric TBI. Intensive Care Medicine 2015;41(6):1067-1076.
  13. Robertson CS, Narayan RK, Gokaslan ZL, et al.. Cerebral arteriovenous oxygen difference as an estimate of cerebral blood flow in comatose patients. J Neurosurg 1989;70(2):222–230.
  14. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al.. Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023;54(7):e314-e370.
  15. Rass V, Helbok R. How to diagnose delayed cerebral ischaemia and symptomatic vasospasm and prevent cerebral infarction in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2021;27(2):103-114.
  16. Ferriero DM, Fullerton HJ, Bernard TJ, et al.. Management of stroke in neonates and children: a scientific statement from the AHA/ASA. Stroke 2019;50(3):e51-e96.
  17. Topjian AA, Scholefield BR, Pinto NP, et al.. Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation 2021;144(13):e194-e233.
  18. Naim MY, Friess SH, Sutton RM, et al.. Multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric post-cardiac-arrest care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  19. Lorusso R, Taccone FS, Belliato M, et al.. Brain monitoring in adult and pediatric ECMO patients: the importance of early and late assessments. Minerva Anestesiologica 2017;83(10):1061-1074.
  20. Cho SM, Ziai W, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebrovascular events in ECMO survivors: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  21. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al.. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008;47(3):303-327.
  22. van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O, et al.. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2016;22 Suppl 3:S37-S62.
  23. Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, et al.. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Critical Care Medicine 2011;39(9):2139-2155.
  24. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Annals of Neurology 2005;58(4):585–593. doi:10.1002/ana.20611 link
  25. Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
  26. Glaser N, Kuppermann N. Cerebral injury in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis: mechanisms, prevention, and current research. Pediatric Diabetes 2024.
  27. Glauser T, Shinnar S, Gloss D, et al.. Evidence-based guideline: treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children and adults. Epilepsy Currents 2016;16(1):48-61.
  28. Kapur J, Elm J, Chamberlain JM, et al.. Randomized trial of three anticonvulsant medications for status epilepticus (ESETT). NEJM 2019;381(22):2103-2113.
  29. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  30. Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  31. Tasker RC, LaRovere KL, Riviello JJ, et al.. Pediatric multimodal neuromonitoring: international Delphi consensus. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  32. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al.. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Intensive Care Medicine 2014;40(9):1189-1209.
  33. Rivera-Lara L, Zorrilla-Vaca A, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebral autoregulation-oriented therapy at the bedside: a comprehensive review. Anesthesiology 2017;126(6):1187-1199.
  34. Tas J, Beqiri E, Czosnyka M, Aries MJ, Smielewski P. COGiTATE follow-up: long-term outcomes of CPPopt-targeted management in adult TBI. Journal of Neurotrauma 2025.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.