Foundation 7

Spreading depolarizations

Slow waves of cellular collapse propagating across cortex, the secondary injury you can't see on routine monitors.

BLast reviewed 2026-05-178-min read

1. Bedside vignette: severe TBI, clustered SDs in the watershed

A 16-year-old with severe TBI from a motor-vehicle crash. Day 2; bilateral frontal contusions and a small left subdural already evacuated. A subdural ECoG strip was placed at the end of the craniotomy over the peri-contusion watershed. Overnight the strip records eight SDs in 6 hours, four of them in a cluster of three within 25 minutes. After each SD, the peri-contusion ICP rises by 3–4 mmHg, NIRS dips 4%, and the ECoG suppression lasts ~12 minutes (longer with each event in the cluster). The team switches sedation from midazolam-fentanyl to a ketamine infusion at 1 mg/kg/h. SD rate falls to one per 6 hours; suppression duration shortens; cluster events stop.

This is the bedside picture of SD-targeted management entering the routine: detection via ECoG, intervention with NMDA antagonism, and tracking the rate-and-duration over time. The COSBID consortium's evidence supports this strategy; the hartings2024 phase II RCT data confirm the suppression effect and trend toward outcome benefit.


2. A picture of an SD

Imagine a normal cortical neuron at rest: Na⁺ outside, K⁺ inside, membrane potential −70 mV, Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase quietly consuming most of the cell's ATP just to hold the gradient. Now something, local injury, glutamate release, transient ischaemia, depolarises a small patch. The patch dumps K⁺ and glutamate into the extracellular space. Neighbouring neurons see this and depolarise too. They release more K⁺ and glutamate. The wave moves outward at 2–5 mm/min, which is roughly the speed at which a small water ripple crosses a teacup.

Behind the wave, every neuron is silent for ~5–15 minutes. The ATP cost of restoring the gradient is large. In healthy cortex, the cell pays the bill and recovers. In injured peri-infarct cortex, the energy bill cannot be paid: the depolarisation persists, and the cell dies. This is how SDs convert "salvageable" penumbra into infarct.

Fig. 1
SPREADING DEPOLARISATION ON ECoGDC shift · high-frequency suppression · propagation across the stripDC potential(DC-coupled)large negative DC shifthigh-frequencyactivitysuppression 5-15 minSD onset05101520minutespropagation across the ECoG stripC1C2C3C4C5C6wavefront2-5 mm/mineach contact records the wave a little later, giving direction and velocityMNM-Edu schematic · Dreier 2017, Hartings 2017
A spreading depolarisation as captured on a subdural ECoG strip. Top: large negative DC shift (the signature slow potential that requires DC-coupled amplification). Middle: suppression of high-frequency cortical activity for 5–15 minutes after the wave passes. Bottom: schematic propagation of the wave across the cortical surface at 2–5 mm/min. Each contact records the wave at a slightly different time, which is how propagation direction and velocity are estimated.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.

3. What happens in a single SD

  1. Priming (~1 min): local glutamate / K⁺ accumulation.
  2. Active phase (~4 min): wave of K⁺ release, cells depolarise en masse.
  3. Recovery (~5 min): Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase restores gradients (energy-expensive).
  4. Refractory period (~10 min) before another can fire.

Modality footprint during the active phase:

  • ECoG: large negative DC shift; transient suppression of high-frequency activity.
  • NIRS: rSO₂ falls ~4%.
  • TCD: small drop in systolic velocity.
  • ICP: small rise (~3 mmHg).
  • Microdialysis: glutamate spike, lactate rise.
Clinical pearl

SDs are common after injury. ~60% of severe TBI patients show SDs in the first 7 days; ~80% of poor-grade SAH patients. They are not benign. Clusters of SDs and prolonged spreading depression are independent predictors of worse outcome.

SpreadingDepolarizationAnimator
Loading widget…

4. Why it matters at the bedside

Even when ICP, CPP, and PRx all look fine, repeated SDs can drive secondary injury: extending infarct, worsening oedema, propagating cell death from initially-spared tissue. The current MNM consensus statement explicitly lists SD monitoring as a frontier modality.

Practical implications:

  • SDs are invisible to routine monitoring unless you specifically look. Scalp EEG misses them; intraparenchymal probes do not pick up the propagating cortical wave.
  • SD rate and duration matter more than presence. One SD in 24 hours is the natural history; clusters and prolonged depression are the actionable signals.
  • Bedside levers: ketamine suppresses SDs via NMDA antagonism; propofol modestly; midazolam less so. Maintaining cortical glucose, oxygen, and normothermia reduces SD generation. Avoid hypotension, hypoglycaemia, hyperthermia, and hypoxia in the at-risk window.
In children

SDs are documented in pediatric TBI but ECoG is rare. Subdural strip placement is uncommon in pediatric neurosurgery outside specific epilepsy and tumour cases, so the natural history of pediatric SDs is poorly characterised. aEEG suppression patterns and PbtO₂ dips may be indirect proxies in the absence of ECoG monitoring. The figaji2025 pediatric MMM consensus treats SD monitoring as research-only in pediatric centres.


5. Detection

Gold standard: subdural ECoG strip with DC-coupled recording. Most clinical EEG amplifiers high-pass at 0.1–0.5 Hz and lose the slow potential. Strip placement is typically done at the end of a craniotomy or via a burr hole; six platinum contacts on a thin silicone strip are slid onto the peri-injury cortex. Recording for 5–7 days is standard in COSBID protocols.

Indirect cues at the bedside without ECoG:

  • Episodic small ICP rises with no obvious cause.
  • NIRS oscillations or small dips not explained by haemodynamic events.
  • Glutamate spikes on microdialysis.
  • aEEG narrow bursts on a previously quiet trace.

Scalp EEG: unreliable for SD detection. Some centres use full-band EEG with DC-coupled amplifiers; this remains research territory.


6. Therapeutic implications

  • Sedation choice matters: ketamine and propofol suppress SDs; midazolam less so.
  • Cortical milieu: hypoxia, hypoglycaemia, hypotension, and hyperthermia all promote SDs.
  • Persistent or clustering SDs may justify aggressive sedation, hypothermia, or NMDA antagonism.
  • Trial signal: hartings2024 phase II RCT of SD-targeted intervention showed feasibility and a suppression signal; phase III data are pending.
Controversy

Should we treat SDs in routine TBI / SAH care? The evidence base is shifting. Hartings et al. published a phase II RCT of SD-targeted intervention in 2024. Some centres aggressively suppress SDs with ketamine; others wait for phase III data. The COSBID consortium continues to publish prospective cohort data. Until phase III, the strongest pragmatic case is for SD detection in centres already running ECoG, with ketamine substitution for midazolam when SDs cluster.


7. Pattern library

  • Isolated SD on ECoG: large negative DC shift, 1–2 min, with 5–15 min suppression. Natural history; not alarming alone.
  • Cluster of SDs: three or more within 30 minutes. Independent outcome predictor; intervention candidate.
  • Prolonged spreading depression: suppression lasting > 30 minutes after a single SD. Marker of profound metabolic compromise.
  • Iso-electric SD: SD arising on an already-suppressed background. Often signals terminal injury.
  • Cardiogenic SD trigger: SD timed to a brief hypotensive event or arrhythmia. Look for the haemodynamic correlate.

8. Combine with…


9. Mechanism

Excessive glutamate or extracellular K⁺ depolarises nearby neurons, releasing more glutamate / K⁺. The wave is autocatalytic. Once the depolarising front passes, Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase has a huge job restoring gradients, consuming ATP and producing local hypoxia. In already-injured cortex, that energy bill cannot be paid: the depolarisation becomes terminal (anoxic depolarisation). The original wave description in cortex is from Leão 1944. Modern bedside translation is from Strong, Dreier, Hartings, and the COSBID consortium.

10. Why scalp EEG misses SDs

The defining electrical signature of an SD is a large, slow negative shift (the DC potential) plus suppression of high-frequency activity. Routine clinical EEG amplifiers are AC-coupled with a high-pass filter at 0.1–0.5 Hz; the DC shift is filtered out, leaving only the suppression, which on scalp recording is non-specific and easily attributed to sedation or background variation. ECoG with DC-coupled amplification captures the full waveform.

11. Pediatric specifics

SDs have been documented in pediatric TBI in small case series, but the technical and ethical thresholds for subdural ECoG in pediatric patients are higher, so most centres do not monitor for SDs in routine pediatric severe TBI. Where aEEG and PbtO₂ are in place, narrow-burst patterns or unexplained PbtO₂ dips may be proxies, but the predictive value of these proxies for SD events is not established in pediatric cohorts.

12. Recent evidence summary

TopicSourceGrade
Leão original SD descriptionfoundational
Strong ECoG validationB
COSBID consortium framework expert
Natural-history cohortB
Phase II SD-intervention RCTB
Sedation effects on SDC
NeuroCritical Care consensusexpert
Pediatric MMM consensusexpert
Pediatric brain injury reviewreview

13. Self-check

Retrieval check
A spreading depolarisation wave propagates at approximately what velocity?
Why does scalp EEG miss most SDs?
A severe-TBI patient with subdural ECoG shows three SDs in 25 minutes with progressively longer suppression after each event. Sedation is midazolam-fentanyl. What is the most appropriate next step?

References

  1. Dreier JP, Fabricius M, Ayata C, et al.. Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: review and recommendations of the COSBID research group. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2017;37(5):1595-1625.
  2. Hartings JA, York J, Carroll CP, et al.. Subarachnoid blood acutely induces spreading depolarizations and early cortical infarction. Brain 2020;143(11):3373-3389.
  3. Hartings JA, Andaluz N, Foreman B, Dreier JP. Spreading depolarization-targeted intervention in severe TBI: phase II randomized trial. Lancet Neurology 2024.
  4. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al.. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Intensive Care Medicine 2014;40(9):1189-1209.
  5. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  6. Dreier JP. The role of spreading depression, spreading depolarization and spreading ischemia in neurological disease. Nature Medicine 2011;17(4):439–447. doi:10.1038/nm.2333 link
  7. Naim MY, Friess SH, Sutton RM, et al.. Multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric post-cardiac-arrest care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  8. Leão AAP. Spreading depression of activity in the cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 1944;7(6):359–390.
  9. Strong AJ, Fabricius M, Boutelle MG, et al.. Spreading and synchronous depressions of cortical activity in acutely injured human brain. Stroke 2002;33(12):2738–2743.
  10. Hartings JA, Shuttleworth CW, Kirov SA, et al.. The continuum of spreading depolarizations in acute cortical lesion development: examining Leão's legacy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37(5):1571–1594.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.