Bispectral Index (BIS)
A proprietary frontal-EEG-derived sedation index, useful for titration in paralysed PICU patients, with well-defined limits in pediatrics.
1. Bedside vignettes: why this matters
Vignette A. Paralysed PICU patient with refractory ICP
A 10-year-old with severe TBI, ICP 24 despite tier-2 measures, started on cisatracurium infusion to abolish patient-ventilator dys-synchrony. The COMFORT-B and SBS are now useless. You place the BIS sensor across the forehead. SQI 92, EMG 25 (low), BIS 38. Over the next hour, with midazolam-fentanyl titration, BIS settles at 42 and ICP falls to 16. The number is doing its job: confirming sedation depth in a child whose face cannot signal it.
Vignette B. Adolescent on ketamine infusion
A 16-year-old with status epilepticus, third-line on a ketamine infusion. You expect BIS to fall into the 40s. Instead, BIS reads 78, the patient is unresponsive, no clinical movement, pupils equal. The cEEG shows electrographic suppression. Ketamine is the classic BIS paradox: it preserves high-frequency activity that the proprietary algorithm interprets as wakefulness. Treat the cEEG and the clinical exam; BIS is misleading here.
Vignette C. 3-month-old infant on midazolam
A 3-month-old post-cardiac surgery on a midazolam-fentanyl infusion plus rocuronium for the first 24 h. The BIS sensor reads 62, SQI 88, EMG 15. The team plans to lighten sedation. Is the infant adequately sedated? The BIS algorithm is not validated below 6 months: cortical maturation, sleep-architecture differences, and the spectral characteristics of immature EEG make the number unreliable. Use the BTF / pediatric sedation scoring fallback, not the BIS, in this age band.
2. What BIS is, and what it is not
BIS is a single-channel frontal-EEG-derived sedation index produced by a proprietary algorithm (Aspect Medical Systems, now Medtronic). The algorithm combines three EEG-derived features into a 0–100 ordinal score:
- Bispectral analysis: a higher-order spectral feature that quantifies phase coupling between frequency components. Coupled, organised activity (awake) gives a high score; decoupled, suppressed activity (deep anaesthesia) gives a low score.
- Power spectral analysis: the relative contribution of beta vs delta-theta-alpha bands. Awake EEG has more beta; deep anaesthesia has more slow waves.
- Suppression analysis: the fraction of each epoch with isoelectric activity (the "suppression ratio", SR), which dominates the score when SR > 0.
The exact weights are proprietary; the score is calibrated against a sedation continuum across a large healthy-adult anaesthesia dataset.
| BIS range | Clinical correlate (adult, healthy cortex) |
|---|---|
| 90–100 | Awake, normal cognition |
| 70–80 | Light sedation, responsive to voice |
| 60–70 | Light-to-moderate sedation |
| 40–60 | Surgical anaesthesia / deep sedation |
| 20–40 | Deep anaesthesia / burst-suppression onset |
| < 20 | Deep burst-suppression to isoelectric |
| 0 | Isoelectric |
What BIS does well
- Sedation depth in paralysed adults: validated for awareness prevention in general anaesthesia (B-Aware, B-Unaware studies).
- TIVA titration: continuous numeric feedback during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia.
- Burst-suppression detection: SR is a reliable marker when present.
- Paralysed PICU sedation titration: the most common modern bedside use.
What BIS cannot do
- Detect seizures: BIS is not a seizure monitor; rhythmic activity can produce anomalous numbers in either direction.
- Prognosticate after brain injury: BIS is not validated for post-arrest or HIE prognostication.
- Predict awareness in pediatric anaesthesia reliably: the meta-analyses show weak benefit and substantial individual variability.
- Be interpreted at face value under ketamine, nitrous oxide, dexmedetomidine, xenon: these agents perturb the bispectrum without matching the clinical sedation depth.
- Be used in neonates and very young infants: cortical maturation makes the algorithm baseline unreliable below 6 months.
BIS is a sedation depth meter built for healthy cortex. Any departure from healthy cortex (injury, age extremes, paradoxical drugs, ictal activity) breaks the calibration. Use BIS for what it was designed for: continuous numeric feedback on sedation depth when the clinical exam is unavailable.
- Below 6 months: do not trust BIS. Cortical maturation, sleep-architecture differences, and immature EEG spectral content make the algorithm unreliable.
- 6 months to 2 years: use with caution; baseline values run higher than adult equivalents at equipotent sedation. Trend within-patient rather than reading absolute thresholds.
- 2 years and above: BIS values track adult ranges reasonably well; the same caveats (ketamine, paralysis, NCSE) apply.
- Validation gap: pediatric outcome trials of BIS-guided anaesthesia are limited; awareness prevention is the adult-data extrapolation.
3. The sensor: where the strip goes
The BIS sensor is a single-use adhesive strip with four electrodes:
| Position | 10–20 location | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Lateral electrodes (1, 4) | FT9 / FT10 (above the temple) | Active EEG channels |
| Medial electrodes (2, 3) | Fp1 / Fp2 (above the eyebrow) | Reference / second active |
| Ground | AF7 / AF8 (between eye and temple) | Ground reference |
The sensor crosses the forehead; placement takes under 60 seconds. The sensor expires (the conductive gel dries) and must be replaced every 24 hours.
Skin prep matters: alcohol clean and gentle abrasion. Without prep, impedances rise into the kΩ range and the EMG channel reads spuriously high; that drives the algorithm to produce nonsense.
EMG contamination is the single most common BIS artefact. The frontalis muscle is right under the sensor; any patient who is awake, light, or anxious tenses the forehead and contaminates the EEG with EMG. The algorithm responds by raising the BIS number. A high BIS with a high EMG bar (> 50) is more likely "frontalis activity from a partly-sedated patient" than "wakefulness".
4. The display: the four numbers to read
Modern BIS monitors display four numbers and one trend:
| Variable | Range | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| BIS | 0–100 | Sedation depth index; primary read |
| SQI (signal quality index) | 0–100 | Algorithm confidence; trust the BIS only when SQI > 50 |
| EMG | 0 to ≥ 70 dB | Frontalis EMG contamination; high EMG inflates BIS |
| SR (suppression ratio) | 0–100% | Fraction of epoch with isoelectric activity; dominates BIS when > 0 |
| Trend | 30–60 min | The most useful single read; a BIS dropping from 65 to 35 over 10 min is more informative than the absolute value |
Always read all four. A BIS of 65 with SQI 85 and EMG 12 is informative. The same BIS with SQI 30 and EMG 70 is meaningless.
5. The numbers to record: the BIS six-pack
| Variable | Symbol | What to log |
|---|---|---|
| Bispectral index | BIS | Hourly; with sedation events |
| Signal quality index | SQI | Hourly; reject readings with SQI < 50 |
| Frontalis EMG | EMG | Hourly; flag readings with EMG > 50 |
| Suppression ratio | SR | Hourly; the burst-suppression marker |
| Sedation regimen | Drug, dose, infusion rate | At every titration |
| Clinical sedation score (when not paralysed) | COMFORT-B, SBS, RASS | Hourly; the gold-standard reference |
The chart entry pairs the numeric BIS with the clinical context (drug, paralysis, time since insult); a BIS value out of context is uninterpretable.
6. What is normal? Age-banded baseline considerations
There is no single "normal" BIS in the PICU; the number is interpreted against the intended sedation depth and the age-typical EEG.
| Age band | Awake BIS | Light sedation target | Deep sedation target | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 6 months | Not interpretable | Not interpretable | Not interpretable | Use COMFORT-B / NPASS; BIS unreliable |
| 6 months – 2 years | 85–100 | 60–80 | 40–60 | Higher baseline than adults; trend over absolute |
| 2–5 years | 90–100 | 60–80 | 40–60 | Approaching adult correlates |
| 5–12 years | 90–100 | 60–80 | 40–60 | Adult ranges apply |
| > 12 years | 90–100 | 60–80 | 40–60 | Adult ranges |
| Adult | 90–100 | 60–80 | 40–60 | Original calibration target |
Sources: . The "deep sedation 40–60" target is the historical anaesthesia value; PICU sedation targets are often lighter (50–70 range) to support neurologic exam, except when treating refractory ICP or status epilepticus.
Pediatric sedation depth scoring should default to the clinical scale (COMFORT-B, State Behavioral Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale) whenever the patient is not paralysed. BIS adds value primarily when paralysis abolishes the clinical exam.
7. What is abnormal? Pattern library
| Pattern | Bedside meaning | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| BIS 60–80 in a non-paralysed patient | Light-to-moderate sedation, conscious sedation range | Titrate to target; cross-check with clinical scale |
| BIS 40–60 in a paralysed patient | Deep sedation / surgical anaesthesia level | Adequate for paralysis-tolerance; recheck hourly |
| BIS < 20 with SR > 30% | Burst-suppression or deep barbiturate | Confirm with cEEG; deliberate for refractory ICP / SE only |
| BIS rising 20+ points abruptly | Wake-up, awareness risk; or stimulation (suction, weaning) | Deepen sedation if intended; reassess |
| BIS dropping 20+ points abruptly | Drug effect, hypotension, cerebral hypoperfusion, seizure offset | Check MAP, drug, ECG; consider cEEG |
| High BIS (70+) with high EMG (60+) | EMG contamination, not wakefulness | Re-prep sensor; check muscle relaxant level; trust SQI |
| BIS 70+ on ketamine, clinical unresponsiveness | Ketamine paradox: high-frequency activity inflates BIS | Trust cEEG and clinical exam, not BIS |
| BIS that does not match the clinical exam | Algorithm misinterpretation (drug, age, injury) | Default to clinical scoring; consider cEEG |
| BIS in HIE / post-arrest brain | Algorithm uncalibrated for injured cortex | Not interpretable for prognostication; use SSEP and cEEG |
| BIS during electrographic seizure | Can be high (rhythmic activity) or low (post-ictal suppression) | Use cEEG; BIS is not a seizure monitor |
Decision tree: what to do with the number
flowchart TD
Reading[BIS reading] --> SQI{SQI > 50?}
SQI -->|No| Reprep[Re-prep sensor; not interpretable]
SQI -->|Yes| EMGcheck{EMG < 50?}
EMGcheck -->|No| EMGartefact[Likely EMG inflation; check paralysis depth]
EMGcheck -->|Yes| Drug{Ketamine or paradoxical agent?}
Drug -->|Yes| Ignore[Number unreliable; use cEEG/exam]
Drug -->|No| Age{Age > 6 months?}
Age -->|No| ClinScore[Use clinical sedation scale; BIS not validated]
Age -->|Yes| Interpret[Interpret per sedation target]
8. Try it: interactive widget
9. Management: sedation depth titration with BIS
BIS does not by itself set the sedation regimen. It provides continuous numeric feedback for titration in the patient whose clinical exam is unavailable (paralysed) or unreliable (deep coma).
9.1 Setting the target
- Define the goal: refractory ICP control (deep, BIS 40–50); status epilepticus suppression (burst-suppression, BIS < 30 with SR 30–60%); ventilator-tolerance with paralysis (BIS 50–60); standard PICU sedation off paralysis (use clinical scale).
- Choose the drug: midazolam, fentanyl, propofol (limit < 4 mg/kg/h in pediatrics; propofol infusion syndrome risk), dexmedetomidine, ketamine (note BIS paradox).
- Set bounds: a lower limit for awareness risk (typically BIS > 40); an upper limit for over-sedation (typically BIS < 70).
- Titrate within bounds: small dose adjustments every 15–30 minutes based on the trend, not the single number.
9.2 BIS-guided refractory ICP sedation in severe TBI
In the paralysed severe-TBI patient on tier-2 measures, sedation depth is one knob in the bundle:
- Establish baseline BIS at current sedation; document SQI and EMG.
- If ICP > 20 sustained and current sedation appears light (BIS 60–70), deepen midazolam-fentanyl until BIS 40–50; reassess ICP at 30 minutes.
- If BIS is already 40–50 and ICP remains high, the next move is not to deepen further; it is to escalate (hyperosmolar, controlled hyperventilation, hypothermia, decompressive craniectomy).
- If pentobarbital coma is initiated for refractory ICP, the BIS target is burst-suppression with SR ~ 50%, confirmed on cEEG.
- Document the time-integrated burst-suppression to anticipate slow wake-up after weaning.
9.3 BIS-guided burst-suppression for refractory status epilepticus
For refractory SE on continuous-infusion midazolam, propofol, or pentobarbital:
- Target electrographic suppression (typically SR 50–75% on cEEG); BIS will read 10–25.
- Maintain target for the protocol-specified duration (typically 24–48 h with no clinical seizures).
- Wean by 25% per 6 hours, tracking BIS and SR.
- Confirm with cEEG every step; BIS alone does not replace cEEG in SE management.
Decision support, not a clinical protocol. Every BIS target above is age-, drug-, and protocol-dependent. Pair with the clinical scale (when possible), cEEG, and the bedside neurological exam; defer to your unit's sedation, status epilepticus, and ICP protocols.
10. Clinical contexts: where BIS earns its place
10.1 Severe TBI on continuous infusion sedation and paralysis
The strongest pediatric use case. Clinical sedation scores fail under NMBA; BIS provides continuous depth feedback. Pair with cEEG to rule out NCSE in patients whose ICP, autoregulation index, or unexplained metabolic derangement suggests it.
10.2 Refractory status epilepticus, third-line therapy
BIS supports titration to a burst-suppression target on continuous infusion midazolam, propofol, or pentobarbital. The endpoint is electrographic (cEEG); BIS is the bedside trend. ESETT and ECLIPSE inform the second-line evidence; third-line endpoints are protocol-driven.
10.3 Pediatric cardiac surgery / ECMO
In post-cardiac-surgery patients on muscle relaxant and high-dose opioid plus midazolam, BIS supports depth titration during the first 24–48 h. ECMO patients are paralysed, sedated, and at neurological risk; BIS is one channel in the multimodal stack alongside NIRS, aEEG, and cEEG.
10.4 Pediatric general anaesthesia (awareness prevention)
The historical use case. Adult evidence for awareness prevention with BIS is moderate (B-Aware, B-Unaware); pediatric evidence is weaker. The Cochrane review concludes that BIS reduces awareness modestly compared with clinical signs alone but is not superior to end-tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring.
10.5 Post-cardiac-arrest (caution)
BIS is not a prognostic tool in post-cardiac-arrest care. The algorithm calibration assumes healthy cortex; injured cortex produces unreliable numbers. Use BIS solely for sedation depth tracking; SSEP, cEEG, NPI, and clinical exam are the prognostic instruments.
10.6 Neonatal HIE and therapeutic hypothermia (avoid)
BIS is not validated below 6 months and should not be used in cooled neonates. aEEG and cEEG are the cortical electrophysiology arm of the neonatal HIE bundle.
10.7 Bacterial meningitis / encephalitis
In the sedated and paralysed child with severe acute encephalitis, BIS supports sedation depth titration alongside aEEG and cEEG. BIS does not detect seizures and does not replace cEEG for NCS screening.
10.8 Brain-death determination (not a substitute)
BIS is not part of the World Brain Death Project framework. An isoelectric BIS may corroborate, but the formal test requires multi-channel EEG, defined sensitivity, ECG monitoring, and trained interpretation.
10.9 DKA cerebral oedema (limited role)
BIS has no proven role in DKA cerebral oedema monitoring; clinical exam, ICP/CPP physiology, and imaging dominate. If the child is intubated and paralysed for raised ICP, BIS can support sedation titration but does not change the management algorithm.
11. Multimodal integration: BIS in the MMM/MNM stack
| Pair with… | What you gain | Worked scenario |
|---|---|---|
| cEEG | Confirm electrographic state; rule out NCSE that BIS cannot see | Any unexplained BIS surge in a sedated patient |
| aEEG | Bedside cortical electrophysiology trend; sedation depth + seizure screen | Cooled HIE infant (note BIS not validated under 6 months) |
| ICP / PRx | Use BIS to titrate sedation as one knob in ICP control | Refractory ICP on tier-2 measures |
| Clinical scale (COMFORT-B / SBS / RASS) | Cross-check BIS against the gold-standard clinical scoring when not paralysed | Routine PICU sedation |
| NIRS / rSO2 | Sedation effect on cerebral metabolism shows up in rSO2; combined trend | Long-stay PICU patients |
| End-tidal anaesthetic | Adjunct in volatile anaesthesia; redundant data improves awareness prevention | OR cases |
12. Setup and technique
12.1 Equipment
- BIS monitor: Medtronic BIS Vista, BIS Complete, or integrated into Philips IntelliVue / GE Carescape.
- BIS sensor: single-use four-electrode adhesive strip; BIS Quattro (adult/pediatric) or BIS Pediatric sensor.
- Skin prep supplies: alcohol pad, NuPrep or similar mild abrasive.
12.2 Placement: 60-second protocol
- Clean the forehead with alcohol; gentle abrasion improves contact.
- Position the sensor with the rectangular pad across the forehead: lateral electrode 1 above the temple at FT9 (left); medial electrode 2 above the right eyebrow; medial electrode 3 above the left eyebrow; lateral electrode 4 at FT10.
- Press firmly for 5 seconds on each electrode; ensure full conductive-gel contact.
- Connect the cable to the sensor and to the monitor.
- Run the impedance check: all four electrodes should read green. Yellow or red means repeat skin prep at that site.
- Wait 60 seconds for the algorithm to acquire enough data for the first BIS value.
12.3 Trust-the-number checklist
Before acting on a BIS reading, walk through:
- SQI > 50: algorithm has enough signal
- EMG < 50: frontalis contamination is acceptable
- No paradoxical drug (ketamine, nitrous, xenon, dexmedetomidine high dose)
- Patient age > 6 months
- No active electrographic seizure (rule out with cEEG)
- Sedation regimen documented: drug, infusion rate, last bolus time
If any item fails, the BIS number is not interpretable in isolation. Document the failure, default to clinical scoring (when possible), and add cEEG if the question is electrographic.
12.4 Continuous trending
- Annotate sedation events: every drug change, every bolus, every paralysis change.
- Annotate clinical events: suction, intubation, weaning, parental visits, painful procedures.
- Annotate position changes: a sensor that has drifted produces SQI drops; re-impedance and re-adhere.
- Replace the sensor every 24 h: gel dries, conductivity falls, EMG contamination rises.
12.5 When to remove the sensor
- The patient is awake and self-aware; BIS adds no clinical information.
- The clinical exam is reliable (off paralysis, off deep sedation); use the clinical scale instead.
- The BIS is persistently uninterpretable (high EMG, low SQI) and the question cannot be answered by the number.
13. Pitfalls
- EMG inflation: frontalis muscle EMG, in light sedation or under-paralysis, inflates BIS. High BIS + high EMG = re-check paralysis depth, not "the patient is awake".
- Ketamine paradox: ketamine preserves high-frequency activity that the algorithm interprets as wakefulness; BIS reads 70+ at deep clinical sedation depths. Use clinical exam and cEEG, not BIS, under ketamine.
- Nitrous oxide, xenon, dexmedetomidine: each perturbs the bispectrum without matching the clinical depth.
- Age < 6 months: algorithm not validated; values unreliable.
- Hypothermia: deep hypothermia slows EEG and lowers BIS; do not interpret rewarming-period BIS as light sedation if cortex is recovering.
- Brain injury: HIE, severe TBI, large stroke all alter cortical activity and the algorithm's interpretation; BIS may track sedation poorly in these patients.
- Seizures: rhythmic ictal activity can produce anomalous BIS (high or low); BIS is not a seizure monitor.
- Hypoglycaemia: alters cortical activity; BIS reads low even off sedation.
- NCSE under sedation: BIS can read deeply sedated while cEEG shows ongoing electrographic status.
- Sensor drying / detachment: SQI drops, EMG inflates; replace every 24 h and after any suspicious change.
14. Combine with…
- Continuous full-montage EEG: the gold standard cortical channel; BIS is its abstraction.
- Amplitude-integrated EEG: bedside cortical electrophysiology trend, complementary in many PICU contexts.
- Pupillometry / NPI: brainstem function alongside cortical sedation depth.
- SSEP: N20 plus cEEG for post-arrest prognosis where BIS does not help.
- Foundations: cerebral metabolism: why hypothermia lowers BIS.
- Integration: refractory status epilepticus: BIS-supported burst-suppression titration.
- Integration: discordance triage: what to do when BIS and the clinical exam disagree.
15. Evidence summary
| Topic | Source | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Original BIS algorithm description | foundational | |
| Bispectral analysis primer | review | |
| Pediatric BIS validation | B | |
| Pediatric ICU BIS | B | |
| Cochrane awareness prevention | A | |
| Pediatric severe TBI (sedation context) | expert | |
| Status epilepticus second-line | A | |
| Status definition (ILAE) | expert | |
| Post-cardiac-arrest pediatric | expert | |
| Pediatric MMM consensus | expert | |
| Neonatal cEEG / aEEG context | expert | |
| ECMO neuromonitoring | C | |
| Brain-death determination | expert | |
| HIE NICHD cooling trial | A | |
| ACNS critical-care EEG terminology | expert |
16. Recent literature (2022–2025)
- Tasker 2023 (pediatric neurocritical care review): places BIS as a tier-2 bedside modality in pediatric neurocritical care, with sedation titration as the primary use case.
- Naim 2023 (pediatric brain injury post-cardiac arrest): explicitly cautions against BIS for prognostication, recommends SSEP and cEEG instead.
- Pediatric MMM consensus (Figaji 2025): positions BIS in tier-2 multimodal monitoring; recommends pairing with cEEG to detect NCSE that BIS cannot see.
- Pediatric sedation guidelines continue to recommend clinical scoring (COMFORT-B, SBS, RASS) as primary; BIS as adjunct under paralysis.
- Awareness prevention literature: Cochrane and follow-on meta-analyses have not changed substantially; BIS reduces awareness modestly versus clinical signs alone, no advantage over end-tidal anaesthetic monitoring in volatile anaesthesia.
- Cardiac surgery and ECMO: BIS in pediatric cardiac surgery and ECMO supports sedation depth tracking; outcome data remain limited.
17. Self-check
References
- Avidan MS, Jacobsohn E, Glick D, et al. (BAG-RECALL). Prevention of intraoperative awareness in a high-risk surgical population. NEJM 2011;365(7):591–600.
- Davidson AJ. Monitoring the anaesthetic depth in children, an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2005;20(3):236–243.
- Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89(4):980–1002. doi:10.1097/00000542-199810000-00023 link
- Whitlock EL, Torres BA, Lin N, et al.. Postoperative delirium in a substudy of cardiothoracic surgical patients in the BAG-RECALL clinical trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2014;118(4):809–817. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000028 link
- Sigl JC, Chamoun NG. An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit 1994;10(6):392–404.
- Glauser T, Shinnar S, Gloss D, et al.. Evidence-based guideline: treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children and adults. Epilepsy Currents 2016;16(1):48-61.
- Kapur J, Elm J, Chamberlain JM, et al.. Randomized trial of three anticonvulsant medications for status epilepticus (ESETT). NEJM 2019;381(22):2103-2113.
- Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al.. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition (PBTF/SCCM). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(3S):S1-S82.
- Tasker RC. Cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: a review. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
- Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D, et al.. A definition and classification of status epilepticus, Report of the ILAE Task Force. Epilepsia 2015;56(10):1515–1523.
- Lorusso R, Taccone FS, Belliato M, et al.. Brain monitoring in adult and pediatric ECMO patients: the importance of early and late assessments. Minerva Anestesiologica 2017;83(10):1061-1074.
- Cho SM, Ziai W, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebrovascular events in ECMO survivors: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Critical Care Medicine 2024.
- Topjian AA, Scholefield BR, Pinto NP, et al.. Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation 2021;144(13):e194-e233.
- Naim MY, Friess SH, Sutton RM, et al.. Multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric post-cardiac-arrest care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
- Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, et al.. Therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children (THAPCA-OH). NEJM 2015;372(20):1898-1908.
- Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, et al.. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. NEJM 2005;353(15):1574-1584.
- Pressler RM, Cilio MR, Mizrahi EM, et al.. The ILAE classification of seizures and the epilepsies: modification for seizures in the neonate (ILAE Task Force). Epilepsia 2021;62(3):615-628.
- Sansevere AJ, Kapur K, Peters JM, et al.. Continuous EEG in the neonatal ICU: utility in seizure detection and neuroprognostication. Pediatric Neurology 2023.
- Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL, et al.. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis (IDSA). Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004;39(9):1267–1284.
- Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al.. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008;47(3):303-327.
- Greer DM, Shemie SD, Lewis A, et al.. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: the World Brain Death Project. JAMA 2020;324(11):1078-1097.
- Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, et al.. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Critical Care Medicine 2011;39(9):2139-2155.
- Glaser N, Barnett P, McCaslin I, et al.. Risk factors for cerebral edema in children with diabetic ketoacidosis. NEJM 2001;344(4):264–269.
- Muir AB, Quisling RG, Yang MCK, Rosenbloom AL. Cerebral edema in childhood diabetic ketoacidosis: natural history, radiographic findings, and early identification. Diabetes Care 2004;27(7):1541–1546.
- Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
- Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
- Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
- Tasker RC, LaRovere KL, Riviello JJ, et al.. Pediatric multimodal neuromonitoring: international Delphi consensus. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
- Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al.. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I and II (ACNS). Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2015;32(2-3):87-105 / 96-108.