Integration scenario

DKA cerebral oedema, pre-empting herniation with the bedside multimodal sweep

A Tier 1 worked scenario for pediatric DKA-associated cerebral oedema. Clinical exam, pupillometry, ONSD, NIRS, and TCD PI combine to identify and act on the time-critical diagnosis before pupillary signs appear.

19-min read

1. Three patient vignettes

Vignette A. Canonical school-age new-onset T1DM

Asher, 9 years old, 28 kg. Presents with 3 days of polyuria, vomiting, and confusion. ED: pH 6.91, HCO3 4 mmol/L, glucose 38 mmol/L, sodium-corrected 142, BUN 14 mmol/L (raised), GCS 12. PECARN risk factors: new-onset, severe acidosis, elevated BUN, low PaCO2, age < 5 to 10 years (Asher just above the highest-risk band but new-onset is the dominant risk). Started on local DKA protocol: 10 mL/kg crystalloid bolus (single, since shocked at arrival), then 0.9% saline at 1.5 times maintenance, insulin 0.05 units/kg/h after the first hour. Hour 4 of rehydration: the bedside nurse reports Asher complained of headache 30 minutes earlier, then became irritable, then sleepier. GCS now 9 (E2 V2 M5). Glucose 18, sodium-corrected 138 (down from 142, a worrying drop), HR 72 (was 110), BP 130/80 (was 105/65). The bedside team activates the cerebral oedema protocol. Modalities available at this regional PICU: clinical exam, bedside pupillometer (donated), ONSD ultrasound (intensivist-performed), bilateral NIRS pads. No invasive ICP, no continuous EEG, no TCD on this shift. The question: is this DKA-CE, and what to do in the next 10 minutes?

Vignette B. Toddler in DKA

Maya, 3 years old, 14 kg. Known T1DM diagnosed 6 months ago; admitted with DKA after a gastroenteritis episode disrupted insulin dosing. pH 7.05, HCO3 8, glucose 28, sodium-corrected 138, GCS 13 at admission. Started on rehydration. Hour 6: the nurse notes Maya is "less responsive than expected." GCS 11. Bradycardia developing. The toddler-specific challenges: GCS scoring under age 5 uses pediatric-modified scale; small head means ONSD threshold may be lower (4.5 to 5.0 mm); pupillometer norms are similar to adults; vascular access for HTS is harder. The team gives 3% NaCl 4 mL/kg = 56 mL through a working peripheral cannula, anaesthesia ready, head-up 30 degrees. NPi 3.8 / 3.7 (sluggish, mild bilateral drop). ONSD 5.3 mm (above the under-5 threshold of 5.0). NIRS symmetric at 62%. Glucose corrected slowly to 17 mmol/L. The toddler-specific lesson: lower ONSD threshold, modified GCS, and the recognition that DKA-CE in younger children is higher-risk (PECARN data show age < 5 is an independent risk factor).

Vignette C. Atypical: silent rise on TCD PI without GCS drop

Daniyal, 12 years old, 42 kg. Known T1DM, DKA after running out of insulin during a holiday. pH 7.00, HCO3 6, glucose 32, sodium-corrected 140. Hour 5 of rehydration: GCS still 14, oriented and answering questions. No headache. Nurse describes him as "a little quiet." TCD performed by an enthusiastic medical resident: PI rising 0.9 to 1.5 over 90 minutes on the right MCA. NIRS 60 / 61 (slight bilateral drop from 65 / 65 at admission). ONSD 5.5 mm (rising). Pupillometry NPi 3.8 / 3.8. HR has fallen from 105 to 88; BP risen from 110 / 70 to 124 / 80. The vital signs are entering Cushing territory without a major GCS drop. The team activates the cerebral oedema protocol on the multimodal evidence alone: pre-emptive HTS 5 mL/kg = 210 mL over 20 minutes, head-up, anaesthesia ready. CT after stabilisation shows early cerebral oedema with effaced sulci. The lesson: TCD PI and Cushing vital signs can precede the dramatic GCS drop; an attentive multimodal sweep catches the trajectory earlier than waiting for the classical clinical picture.


2. The clinical question

In a child with DKA developing new neurological symptoms 4 to 12 hours into rehydration, how do you confirm cerebral oedema fast enough to act before herniation? The integration question is the sequence: clinical exam first, pupillometry and ONSD next, NIRS and TCD if available, and treatment before imaging.


3. Pathophysiology refresher

DKA-associated cerebral oedema is the leading cause of death and severe neurological morbidity in pediatric DKA. Incidence is approximately 0.5 to 1% of DKA admissions; mortality 20 to 25%; severe neurological disability 25%. Risk factors (PECARN, Glaser cohorts) include: age < 5 years, new-onset T1DM, severe acidosis (pH < 7.10), elevated BUN, low PaCO2 (severe hyperventilation), and historically (now debated) rapid sodium correction or excessive fluid administration.

Mechanism: the picture is incompletely understood but combines (1) vasogenic oedema from BBB dysfunction in a brain conditioned to high osmolality, (2) cytotoxic injury from osmotic gradients across cell membranes as plasma osmolality falls during rehydration, (3) cerebral hypoperfusion during initial shock with reperfusion injury during rehydration, and (4) inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction. The historic narrative blamed aggressive fluid replacement; the PECARN FLUID trial (Kuppermann 2018) clarified that within reasonable bounds, neither sodium concentration nor rate of fluid administration changes neurological outcome, suggesting the oedema is more about the underlying pathophysiology and less about iatrogenic fluid management. Slow correction of sodium and glucose (≤ 5 mmol/L/h each) remains standard, both for the cerebral oedema concern and for systemic safety.

The clinical trajectory is the diagnostic anchor. Glaser 2001 derived the diagnostic criteria from a case-control study:

  • Abnormal motor or verbal response to pain
  • Decorticate or decerebrate posturing
  • Cranial nerve palsy (especially III, IV, VI)
  • Abnormal respiratory pattern (grunting, tachypnoea, Cheyne-Stokes, apnoeustic)

Plus the major criteria in the bedside operational sense (the most-used trigger):

  • Altered mental status / fluctuating consciousness, particularly GCS drop ≥ 2
  • Sustained heart rate decrease not attributable to improved volume status (Cushing component)
  • Age-inappropriate incontinence

Pre-treatment warning signs that should prompt the multimodal sweep: headache (especially severe or sudden), persistent vomiting after correction begins, bradycardia or rising blood pressure (Cushing), falling GCS even by 1 point, pupillary changes, incontinence, new focal signs.

ONSD as a non-invasive ICP surrogate: cerebrospinal fluid surrounds the optic nerve and transmits intracranial pressure changes. The optic nerve sheath dilates when ICP rises above approximately 20 mmHg. Threshold: > 5.0 to 5.5 mm in children 1 to 15 years (Padayachy 2012, 2016); under 1 year approximately 4.5 mm. Measurement: linear high-frequency probe, 3 mm posterior to the globe, both eyes, average two measurements per eye.

TCD PI in raised ICP: PI rises as cerebrovascular distal resistance rises. In DKA-CE, PI > 1.4 is suggestive of raised ICP; a rise from baseline of 50% is more informative than the absolute number. PI is not ICP (de Riva 2012 caveat); use it as a triage, not a measurement.

NIRS in DKA-CE: bilateral symmetric drop suggests global cerebral oedema; asymmetric drop suggests focal pathology (uncommon in DKA-CE; more typical of stroke). NIRS trend matters more than the absolute number.

Pupillometry NPi: a drop from baseline NPi 4.5 to 3.5 is meaningful; a drop to < 3.0 with sluggish response suggests early herniation. Asymmetric NPi drop signals uncal herniation; bilateral drop signals diencephalic compromise.


4. The multimodal picture table

ModalitySuggests cerebral oedemaWhat it rules outWhat it adds
GCSDrop ≥ 2 from highest pre-eventSubclinical seizure (some overlap)The primary trigger (Glaser criterion)
Vital signsBradycardia, rising BP (Cushing)Sepsis (different pattern)Earliest physiological sign
Pupillometry NPiBilateral drop, then asymmetricSedation aloneQuantifies "sluggish" pupil
ONSD> 5.0 to 5.5 mm in 1-15 y; > 4.5 mm < 1 yAcute / chronic distinctionNon-invasive ICP surrogate
TCD PI> 1.4 or ≥ 50% rise from baselineSpecificity for ICPTriage to imaging / treatment
TCD EDVFalling EDV signals rising distal resistanceHealthy waveformEarliest TCD change
NIRS bilateralSymmetric drop = global; asymmetric = focalPure hypotensionRegional vs global
Bedside neuro examNew focal signs, posturing, cranial nerve palsiesHypoglycaemia, subclinical seizureDirect clinical evidence
Glucose, sodiumFalling rapidly may be contributory; not diagnosticHypoglycaemia (different cause of GCS drop)Safety guardrails
CT (after stabilisation)Effaced sulci, slit ventricles, decreased grey-white differentiationHaemorrhage, stroke, abscessConfirmation; not for diagnosis

The most useful pairings: GCS + vital signs (the diagnostic core), pupillometry + ONSD (early ICP surrogates), and NIRS + TCD PI (when both available).


5. Decision tree

Fig. 1
DKA CEREBRAL OEDEMA TIMELINEthe hour 4-8 window: MNM-supported recognition pre-empts herniationtime-critical window (H4-H8)H0admission; DKA criteria;rehydration startedH4warning signs: headache,irritabilityH4:15bedside nurse triggersthe teamH4:30Glaser criteria (GCSdrop, Cushing); MNMsweep: NPi drop, raisedONSD, symmetric NIRSdrop, raised TCD PI; HTSbolus before CTH5GCS recovering; Na 145;CT confirms diffuseoedemaH8second dip; secondbolus; anaesthesiaintubates; PICUD2slow improvementD5extubated; returning tobaselineMNM-Edu schematic
DKA cerebral oedema timeline. Hour 0: admission, DKA criteria met, rehydration started. Hour 4: subtle warning signs (headache, irritability). Hour 4:15: bedside nurse triggers the team. Hour 4:30: Glaser criteria met (GCS drop, Cushing); multimodal sweep documents NPi drop, raised ONSD, symmetric NIRS drop, raised TCD PI; HTS bolus given before CT. Hour 5: GCS recovering, sodium 145; transfer to CT confirms diffuse oedema. Hour 8: second dip, second bolus, anaesthesia intubates; PICU admission. Day 2: slow improvement. Day 5: extubated, returning to baseline. The shaded box from hour 4 to hour 8 is the time-critical window where MNM-supported recognition pre-empts herniation.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.

6. Step-by-step bedside actions

  1. Document baseline GCS, NPi, NIRS, ONSD, vital signs at admission and hourly during the first 12 hours of rehydration. All subsequent values are interpreted as deltas.
  2. Brief the bedside nurse on warning signs: headache, persistent vomiting after correction, bradycardia, rising BP, falling GCS even by 1 point, pupillary changes, incontinence, new focal signs. Document in the chart for handover.
  3. When any warning sign appears, perform the multimodal sweep within 5 minutes: GCS, NPi bilateral, ONSD bilateral, NIRS bilateral, vital signs, glucose, sodium (point of care).
  4. Apply Glaser criteria: GCS drop ≥ 2, Cushing pattern, cranial nerve palsy, abnormal posturing, abnormal respiratory pattern, age-inappropriate incontinence. Any one major criterion plus two minor warrants the cerebral oedema protocol.
  5. Treat before CT: the time-critical diagnosis. 3% NaCl 5 mL/kg over 10 to 20 minutes (central line preferred but peripheral acceptable for first dose); for Asher at 28 kg, 140 mL. Mannitol 0.5 to 1 g/kg is the alternative.
  6. Reduce IV fluid rate to maintenance only. Head-up 30 degrees, neck neutral, avoid flat positioning. Airway team ready; anaesthesia called.
  7. If GCS ≤ 8 sustained, intubate, but maintain normocapnia (PaCO2 35 to 40). Avoid hyperventilation (vasoconstriction, ischaemia).
  8. Recheck sodium, glucose, ABG in 30 minutes post-bolus. Target sodium rise of 2 to 5 mmol/L per dose. Sodium ceiling 150 to 155 in this acute window.
  9. Transfer to CT once stabilised (post-bolus, airway secure if needed). CT confirms diffuse oedema (effaced sulci, slit ventricles, decreased grey-white differentiation). Look for alternative diagnoses (haemorrhage, stroke, abscess) on the way.
  10. Continue neuroprotection bundle: normothermia (paracetamol PR + tepid sponging), normocapnia, normoxia, sodium 145 to 155, slow glucose correction (≤ 5 mmol/L/h), CPP maintained, head-up.

7. Management ladder and endpoints

TierInterventionEndpoint
0Baseline MNM at admission; hourly neuro exam; nurse warning-sign awarenessBaseline established
1Warning sign appears: multimodal sweepGlaser criteria assessed
2Glaser criteria met: HTS or mannitol bolus, head-up, airway teamBolus delivered
3Reassess at 15 to 30 min; CT after stabilisationImprovement documented or escalation triggered
4Second bolus, intubation, sodium ceiling approachedICU-level care
5Refractory or rapid progression: ICU transfer, neurosurgical consult, palliative care if appropriatePlan determined

Success looks like: GCS recovering within 30 minutes of HTS, NPi normalising, ONSD falling, normalisation of vital signs, eventual extubation within 24 to 48 hours, discharge from PICU within 5 days, full neurological recovery.

Failure looks like: refractory neurological deterioration despite escalating HTS and supportive care; brainstem signs progressing; CT showing diffuse oedema with herniation; transition to either heroic ICP control measures or compassionate care.

Educational algorithm, not a clinical protocol. This walkthrough is a teaching aid. Defer to your unit's pediatric protocols, current PBTF / Kochanek / local guidelines, and your senior clinical team. Doses, thresholds, and decision points are starting points, not prescriptions.

8. Variant subsections

8.1 New-onset T1DM vs known diabetes

New-onset T1DM is the highest-risk presentation; the brain has been chronically hyperglycaemic and hyperosmolar for days or weeks, and adaptive solutes (idiogenic osmoles) make the brain vulnerable to rapid plasma osmolality changes during rehydration. Known diabetes with intercurrent DKA has somewhat lower risk because the brain is less chronically adapted. The treatment approach is identical; the surveillance threshold should be lower in new-onset.

8.2 Severity-stratified rehydration

The historic narrative (excessive fluid causes cerebral oedema) was clarified by the PECARN FLUID trial: within reasonable bounds (10 to 20 mL/kg initial bolus, then 1.25 to 1.5 times maintenance), the rate and sodium concentration of rehydration do not affect neurological outcome. Avoid overly aggressive bolus volumes (> 20 mL/kg) and avoid sodium correction faster than 5 mmol/L/h; otherwise the historic concerns appear less rate-dependent than once thought.

8.3 Recognition timing windows

The classic window for DKA-CE is 4 to 12 hours into rehydration. Cases outside this window do occur (early at presentation, or up to 24 hours in). The clinical trajectory (headache → irritability → drowsiness → GCS drop → Cushing → pupillary signs) typically unfolds over 1 to 4 hours. The team should maintain vigilance throughout the first 24 hours of treatment, not just at hour 4 to 12.

8.4 Refractory cases

When initial HTS fails to improve GCS or vital signs within 30 minutes, escalate: second bolus, intubation (maintain normocapnia), brief hyperventilation as a bridge to herniation control only (PaCO2 30 to 35 transiently), continuous HTS infusion to maintain sodium 145 to 155, transfer to tertiary PICU for invasive ICP monitoring if available. Refractory cases account for the bulk of DKA-CE mortality.

8.5 Hypoglycaemia and seizure as differentials

A child in DKA who becomes confused or drowsy can have hypoglycaemia (treatment-induced) or a subclinical seizure rather than (or in addition to) cerebral oedema. Always check glucose at the bedside before assuming CE. Subclinical seizures from osmotic shifts are uncommon but documented; cEEG is not standard in DKA-CE workup unless seizure is clinically suspected. The decision tree branches early on bedside glucose and clinical posture; cerebral oedema remains the dominant concern in the absence of other explanations.

8.6 Resource-limited recognition

In regional centres without pupillometry, ONSD, or NIRS, clinical exam plus vital signs remain the diagnostic foundation. The Glaser criteria are bedside criteria that need no equipment. The MNM modalities support, do not replace, the clinical recognition. A regional team with a vigilant nurse, a senior physician, and bedside HTS available can manage the most dangerous hour of DKA-CE without tertiary monitors.


9. Multimodal integration matrix

PairWhat you gain
GCS + vital signsThe Glaser core; sufficient to trigger treatment without tertiary monitors
GCS + pupillometryQuantifies the bedside neuro exam; documentable for handover
Pupillometry + ONSDTwo non-invasive ICP surrogates that move together early
ONSD + TCD PIBoth rise with ICP; ONSD is anatomic, TCD PI is haemodynamic
NIRS bilateral + clinical examSymmetric NIRS drop supports global oedema; useful confirmatory
MNM sweep + sodium and glucose trajectoryRules out treatment-induced metabolic confounders
MNM sweep + CT post-stabilisationCT confirms diagnosis and excludes alternatives (haemorrhage, stroke)
MNM sweep + airway team activationThe MNM-supported recognition triggers airway team mobilisation in parallel with treatment

10. Worked alternative scenarios

10.1 What if the GCS drop is actually hypoglycaemia?

Asher at hour 4: GCS 9, point-of-care glucose 2.8 mmol/L. This is hypoglycaemia, not cerebral oedema (treatment-induced; the insulin infusion may need re-titration). Give 5 mL/kg of 10% dextrose (1.4 g/kg of glucose), recheck glucose in 10 minutes, expect GCS recovery. Defer HTS until glucose is normalised. The bedside team must check glucose before the multimodal sweep concludes "cerebral oedema."

10.2 What if the deterioration is subclinical seizure?

A 6-year-old in DKA, hour 8 of rehydration, GCS 11 → 7 over 30 minutes; no Cushing pattern. The bedside team applies a 4-channel limited EEG and sees continuous rhythmic 3 Hz activity over the right hemisphere. This is non-convulsive status epilepticus, not (purely) cerebral oedema. Load levetiracetam 60 mg/kg; consider HTS in parallel if Glaser criteria are also met. cEEG is not standard in DKA-CE workup, but should be considered when the clinical picture is atypical or the patient is paralysed for intubation.

10.3 What if the CT is normal?

Asher post-stabilisation: GCS recovered to 12, NPi normalised, vitals normal. CT shows no oedema, no haemorrhage, normal ventricles. The CT may be normal even in cerebral oedema (early changes can be subtle; the CT is more sensitive 6 to 24 hours later). Do not retroactively un-treat; the bedside picture met Glaser criteria, treatment was indicated. Continue neuroprotection, repeat CT or MRI in 12 to 24 hours if clinically warranted, and follow the trajectory. The MNM-supported empirical treatment is the right answer even when imaging is initially negative.


11. Outcome data

  • Glaser 2001: case-control study deriving the diagnostic criteria; baseline cohort for understanding clinical features and risk factors.
  • Muir 2004: pediatric DKA cerebral oedema review; emphasises clinical recognition, bedside treatment, and the limits of imaging.
  • Kuppermann 2018 PECARN FLUID trial: 1389 children in DKA randomised to fluid rate and sodium content variations; no detectable difference in neurological outcome; clarifies the role of rehydration practices.
  • Glaser 2024 review: contemporary synthesis of DKA-CE epidemiology, mechanism, recognition, and treatment.
  • Padayachy 2012, 2016: pediatric ONSD reference data and threshold > 5.0 to 5.5 mm in 1-15 years.
  • Robba 2018 ONSD review: synthesises ONSD as a non-invasive ICP marker.
  • Tasker 2018 pediatric cEEG: not specifically DKA but relevant for the seizure differential.

12. Pitfalls

  • Waiting for the classical clinical picture before treating. Treat on Glaser criteria; do not wait for blown pupils.
  • Delaying treatment for CT. Treat first, image after. The transport risk in a deteriorating patient is real.
  • Forgetting bedside glucose check. Hypoglycaemia is the most important confounder; check before treating empirically.
  • Hyperventilating prophylactically. Marion 2002 and others show worse outcome with sustained hyperventilation; brief bridge only.
  • Correcting sodium and glucose too fast. ≤ 5 mmol/L/h each; faster correction risks osmotic demyelination and worsening oedema.
  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation. A single 10 mL/kg bolus only if shocked; otherwise maintain at 1.25 to 1.5 times maintenance.
  • Underestimating the nurse's vigilance. The most important diagnostic input is the nurse who notices the headache or the irritability; the multimodal sweep is the confirmation, not the trigger.
  • Reading NIRS in isolation. A symmetric NIRS drop is supportive but the GCS and vital signs are the diagnosis.
  • Forgetting alternative diagnoses. Haemorrhage, stroke, abscess, and metabolic encephalopathy can mimic DKA-CE; the CT after stabilisation rules these in or out.

13. Pediatric considerations

In children

Six pediatric-specific points.

  1. Age < 5 years is an independent risk factor for DKA-CE. Lower threshold for the multimodal sweep; consider closer monitoring throughout the first 24 hours of treatment.

  2. GCS scoring under age 5 uses the pediatric-modified scale. The standard adult GCS underestimates infants and toddlers; the pediatric GCS (modified verbal response) is more accurate.

  3. ONSD thresholds are age-banded: under 1 year approximately 4.5 mm; 1 to 15 years 5.0 to 5.5 mm. Adult cutoffs do not transfer.

  4. HTS doses are per-kg: 3% NaCl 3 to 5 mL/kg over 10 to 20 minutes; mannitol 0.5 to 1 g/kg. Central line preferred but peripheral acceptable for first rescue dose.

  5. The bedside nurse is the diagnostic key. A vigilant nurse noticing the headache, the irritability, or the subtle GCS drop initiates the cascade. Train and trust them.

  6. Family communication: cerebral oedema in DKA is sudden and frightening for families. Have a clinician present at the bedside throughout the acute phase; explain the protocol; involve palliative care if outcome is uncertain.


14. Combine with


15. Evidence summary and recent literature (2022 to 2025)

Foundational

TopicReferenceGrade
Glaser diagnostic criteriaB
DKA-CE review (Muir)review
PECARN FLUID trialA
Glaser 2024 reviewreview
Pediatric ONSD B
ONSD as ICP surrogatereview
TCD PI as ICP triage B / review
Pupillometry NPi B

Recent literature (2022 to 2025)

  • Glaser 2024 review: the most current synthesis of DKA-CE pathophysiology, recognition, and treatment; integrates PECARN data with the older Glaser criteria.
  • Helbok 2024 pediatric MMM update: places non-invasive ICP surrogates (ONSD, TCD PI, NIRS) in the bedside DKA-CE bundle.
  • Figaji 2025 pediatric MMM consensus: same framework for non-invasive ICP surrogates in DKA-CE.
  • Tasker 2023 PCCM review: integrative pediatric MMM piece; DKA-CE in the broader acute encephalopathy framework.
  • Kerscher 2023: pediatric pupillometry NPi reference data.
  • Robba 2018 ONSD pediatric: pediatric-specific synthesis of ONSD as ICP surrogate.

16. Self-check

Retrieval check
A 9-year-old in DKA, hour 4 of rehydration. The bedside nurse reports headache 30 minutes ago, then irritability, now drowsiness. GCS dropped from 14 to 9 over 30 minutes; HR fell from 110 to 72; BP rose from 105/65 to 130/80. Glucose 18, sodium 138, point-of-care glucose just confirmed. What is the best next action?
A 12-year-old in DKA at hour 5 of rehydration. GCS still 14, oriented. Subtle: HR fell from 105 to 88, BP rose from 110/70 to 124/80, TCD PI rose from 0.9 to 1.5 over 90 minutes, ONSD 5.5 mm, NIRS 60 / 61 (down from 65 / 65). Pupillometry NPi 3.8 / 3.8 (mild drop). What is the most defensible next step?
A 4-year-old in DKA. Hour 6 of rehydration. GCS 11 (was 14). NPi 3.8 / 3.7, sluggish. ONSD 5.3 mm. Heart rate falling. Sodium 138 (was 142 at admission). Glucose 16 (was 30). What rate of sodium and glucose correction should you target going forward?

References

  1. Glaser N, Barnett P, McCaslin I, et al.. Risk factors for cerebral edema in children with diabetic ketoacidosis. NEJM 2001;344(4):264–269.
  2. Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
  3. Glaser N, Kuppermann N. Cerebral injury in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis: mechanisms, prevention, and current research. Pediatric Diabetes 2024.
  4. Muir AB, Quisling RG, Yang MCK, Rosenbloom AL. Cerebral edema in childhood diabetic ketoacidosis: natural history, radiographic findings, and early identification. Diabetes Care 2004;27(7):1541–1546.
  5. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and invasively measured ICP in children. Child's Nervous System 2016;32(10):1779–1785. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3068-4 link
  6. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter and invasive ICP in children. Part I: repeatability, observer variability and general analysis. Childs Nervous System 2016;32(10):1769-1778.
  7. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, et al.. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(8):1284-1294.
  8. de Riva N, Budohoski KP, Smielewski P, et al.. Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: what it is and what it is not. Neurocritical Care 2012;17(1):58-66.
  9. Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson KA, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP). Surgical Neurology 2004;62(1):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.007 link
  10. Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, et al.. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study (ORANGE). Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(12):2102-2111.
  11. Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, et al.. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(12):2102–2111. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 link
  12. Robba C, et al.. Optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound in pediatric patients. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2018.
  13. Tasker RC, Goodkin HP, Sánchez Fernández I, et al.. Refractory status epilepticus in children: intention to treat with continuous infusions of midazolam and pentobarbital. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2016;17(10):968–975. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000900 link
  14. Meert KL, Eggly S, Berger J, et al.. Physicians experiences and recommendations for sharing the news of a child's death. JAMA Pediatrics 2015;169(8):782-789.
  15. Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  16. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  17. Tasker RC. Cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: a review. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  18. Kerscher SR, et al.. Pediatric ultrasound ONSD vs fundoscopy for treatment-relevant raised ICP. Childs Nerv Syst 2023.
  19. Kerscher SR, Schoni D, Hurth H, et al.. The Neurological Pupil index in the pediatric ICU: feasibility and clinical correlates. Neurocritical Care 2023.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.