Integration scenario

Resource-limited bedside MNM

The regional PICU without invasive ICP, without full-montage cEEG, often without TCD. A three-modality bundle (clinical exam, ONSD, fontanelle US, handheld TCD-PI) and the principle that sequential trending beats single snapshots. Pediatric-first.

21-min read

1. Three patient vignettes

Vignette A. Amani, 3 years, suspected meningitis in a regional PICU

Amani, 3 years old, 13 kg, presents to a 6-bed regional PICU with three days of fever, headache, vomiting, and a stiff neck. CT (available) shows mild cerebral oedema with effacement of basal cisterns. CSF is purulent. Antibiotics started in the emergency department. No invasive ICP monitor available. No full-montage cEEG. What is available: ultrasound machine, bedside aEEG (4-channel), 2 MHz TCD probe (handheld), portable pupillometer, NIRS. The unit nurse cohorts patients; the intensivist covers PICU and ED. Question: what is the minimum viable MNM bundle, how often do we reassess, and what triggers transfer to the tertiary centre 4 h away?

Vignette B. Bashir, 6 weeks, suspected raised ICP from haemorrhage

Bashir, 6 weeks, 4.6 kg, presents to a district hospital after 24 h of poor feeding and a tense fontanelle noted by the parent. No CT scanner on site. What is available: bedside ultrasound (with neonatal probe), aEEG, pulse oximetry, glucose monitoring. The fontanelle US shows ventriculomegaly with a hyperechoic lesion suggesting intraventricular haemorrhage with hydrocephalus. Pupils 4 mm reactive bilaterally; fontanelle is tense and non-pulsatile. Question: in this neonate, what does the fontanelle US tell you about ICP, what is the role of aEEG, and how do we manage during the transfer to the regional unit (estimated 90 minutes by road)?

Vignette C. Chitra, 9 years, post-TBI in a busy LMIC PICU

Chitra, 9 years, 28 kg, transferred from a peripheral hospital after a road traffic accident. GCS 9, right pupil 4 mm reactive, left 3 mm reactive. CT shows a small subdural with mild oedema. No invasive ICP available at the receiving PICU. The unit has 12 beds, 2 nurses for the shift, and one TCD probe shared between PICU and ED. NIRS is available on one bed. Question: how do we triage Chitra (does she need an EVD, is medical management adequate, when do we re-image, who needs the NIRS probe most)?


2. The clinical question

For each of these children: what is the minimum viable multimodal bundle at this centre, what is the surveillance interval, and what triggers an escalation that the unit may not be able to provide locally (transfer, surgery, mechanical ventilation)?


3. Pathophysiology refresher

The brain in critical illness loses two things at the same time: autoregulatory reserve and the safety margin between supply and demand. Whether the driver is TBI, infection, DKA, HIE, or stroke, the final common pathway is similar: cytotoxic and vasogenic oedema, mass effect, falling CPP, falling tissue oxygen delivery, secondary injury.

The role of monitoring is to detect this cascade early enough to intervene. In a well-resourced centre, intracranial pressure is measured directly, NIRS and PbtO2 give tissue-level information, and cEEG monitors cortex. In a resource-limited centre, the bundle is necessarily indirect: a structured clinical exam captures most of the supratentorial injury; ONSD is a surrogate for ICP greater than 20 mmHg; TCD PI is a surrogate for cerebral resistance; fontanelle US in infants is anatomy plus ICP surrogate; aEEG is the reduced-channel surrogate for cEEG.

Why does each surrogate work?

  • ONSD: the optic nerve is a CNS structure surrounded by subarachnoid space contiguous with the intracranial space. Raised ICP transmits into the perineural subarachnoid space and distends the sheath. Pediatric thresholds: greater than 5.5 mm (over 1 y) or greater than 5.0 mm (under 1 y) correlate with ICP greater than 20 mmHg with sensitivity 0.85 to 0.95 and specificity 0.7 to 0.85 across paediatric series.
  • TCD PI: distal cerebrovascular resistance rises as ICP rises; the Bellner regression (ICP approximately equal to 10.93 × PI − 1.28) is a triage tool, not a measurement, but a PI greater than 1.4 with low EDV in the right clinical context is highly suggestive of raised ICP.
  • Fontanelle US in infants: anatomy (ventriculomegaly, midline shift, mass lesion) plus indirect ICP surrogate (fontanelle tension correlates with ICP in infants).
  • aEEG: continuity, cycling, and seizure detection in a 2 to 4 channel reduced array; not diagnostic for NCSE but a useful screening tool.
  • NIRS rSO2: tissue oxygen saturation in the frontal cortex; falling rSO2 in the affected hemisphere flags worsening perfusion-extraction balance.
  • NPi (pupillometry): digitised pupillary reaction that survives ambient lighting and inter-rater variability.

The sequential-trending principle. No single non-invasive measurement is as specific as direct ICP monitoring. The compensation is trending: an ONSD that grows from 4.8 to 5.6 over 2 hours is more informative than a single 5.6 measurement, and a TCD PI rising from 1.0 to 1.6 is more informative than a single 1.6. The 2 to 4 hour reassessment interval is the operational expression of this principle.

The Figaji 2025 paediatric MMM consensus formalises this approach: bundles are defined by what resources are available, with a minimum viable set for the lowest-resource centre and incremental additions as resources allow.


4. The multimodal picture

ModalityAvailable at most resource-limited centres?What it showsWhat it triggers
Structured clinical examAlwaysGCS trend, pupillary response, focal signs, fontanelle in infantsAction on any worsening; reassessment interval 1 to 2 h
Pupillometry (manual)AlwaysPupil size, reactivity, asymmetryAsymmetry or new fixed dilatation = urgent imaging or surgery
NPi (digital pupillometer)Increasingly availableNPi 3 to 5 normal; less than 3 abnormal; less than 0.6 criticalFalling NPi triggers re-evaluation
Bedside ultrasound (ONSD)Where US is availableONSD age-banded thresholds; sequential rise more useful than single valueONSD greater than threshold prompts CT and management for raised ICP
Fontanelle ultrasoundIn infants where US availableVentricular size, midline shift, mass effect, IVHDrives surgical decisions, transfer urgency
Handheld TCDOften availablePI, EDV, MFV; trend across hoursRising PI plus falling EDV plus clinical change = urgent action
Bedside aEEGOften availableContinuity, cycling, ictal envelopeLoss of cycling, ictal envelope triggers neurology consult and AED loading
Bedside NIRSSometimes availablerSO2 trend; asymmetryAsymmetry or falling rSO2 prompts perfusion review
CT (on-site or accessible)VariableAnatomy: oedema, mass, midline shift, ventricular sizeSurgical decisions; transfer triggers
MRISelected, often delayedDetailed anatomy, ischaemia, oedema patternsSubacute management, prognosis
Invasive ICP, PbtO2, cEEGOften absentDirect measurementsWhen available, the gold standard

5. Decision tree

Fig. 1
RESOURCE-LIMITED MONITORING BUNDLEnon-invasive, repeatable, trended at the bedsideClinical exam · q1-2 hGCS, pupils, fontanelle, focal signsONSD (ultrasound) · q2-4 hage-banded thresholdsHandheld TCD PI · q2-4 hbedside pulsatility trendFontanelle US (infants)ventricles, IVH, midlineThe trend across hours is more informative than any single snapshot.MNM-Edu schematic
The minimum viable bundle for a resource-limited PICU. Clinical exam (GCS, pupils, fontanelle, focal signs) every 1 to 2 hours. ONSD by bedside ultrasound every 2 to 4 hours with age-banded thresholds. Handheld TCD PI every 2 to 4 hours. Fontanelle US in infants. The trend across hours is more informative than any single snapshot.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.
Educational algorithm, not a clinical protocol. This walkthrough is a teaching aid. Defer to your unit's pediatric protocols, current PBTF / Kochanek / local guidelines, and your senior clinical team. Doses, thresholds, and decision points are starting points, not prescriptions.

6. Step-by-step bedside actions

For Amani (3 y, 13 kg, suspected bacterial meningitis with cerebral oedema). Times are from PICU admission.

  1. 0 to 30 min: structured first assessment. GCS (start with verbal: opening eyes to voice, withdrawing to pain, slurring words), pupillary exam (size in mm, reactivity yes or no, symmetry), fontanelle in any infant, focal neurological signs (asymmetric tone, posturing, hemiparesis). Document baseline.
  2. 30 to 60 min: empirical antibiotics already started in ED, continue. Adequate dosing: ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg IV (max 4 g), plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV (target trough 15 to 20). Steroid co-administration per local protocol (dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg/day in 4 divided doses for pneumococcal meningitis).
  3. 60 to 90 min: ONSD ultrasound. With the linear probe (or curved if linear unavailable), measure ONSD 3 mm posterior to the globe on transverse view. Average of 3 measurements per eye. Age-banded threshold for a 3-year-old: greater than 4.5 to 5.0 mm. Document baseline.
  4. 60 to 90 min: TCD if probe available. MCA insonation through the temporal window. PI, EDV, MFV. Healthy 3-year-old: MFV roughly 85 cm/s, PI 0.7 to 1.0. Document baseline.
  5. 60 to 90 min: bedside aEEG. Reduced-channel array. Continuity (continuous, discontinuous, burst-suppression, isoelectric); cycling (sleep-wake variation); ictal envelope (saw-tooth rises).
  6. 60 to 90 min: NIRS if available. Bilateral frontal probes. Baseline rSO2 (typically 60 to 80% in children); asymmetry less than 10% is normal.
  7. Every 1 to 2 h: structured clinical exam. GCS, pupils, focal signs; document trend.
  8. Every 2 to 4 h: ONSD plus TCD plus aEEG review. Trend the numbers. A two-out-of-three rule: if two of ONSD, TCD-PI, and clinical exam are worsening, escalate (CT, mannitol or hypertonic saline, prepare for transfer).
  9. Triggers for CT or transfer: GCS drop greater than 2; new pupillary asymmetry or unilateral dilation; ONSD rising rapidly toward or above threshold; TCD PI greater than 1.4 with low EDV; loss of aEEG cycling or new ictal envelope; falling rSO2.
  10. Triggers for empirical osmotherapy: clinical deterioration without immediate CT availability; two-of-three bundle worsening; signs of imminent herniation. Dose: hypertonic saline 3% 5 mL/kg (preferred in meningitis where the blood-brain barrier may be disrupted) or mannitol 0.5 g/kg.

7. Management ladder and endpoints

Success looks like: GCS improving or stable; pupils symmetric and reactive; ONSD stable or falling below threshold; TCD PI falling toward 1.0; aEEG cycling preserved; rSO2 stable.

Failure looks like: GCS dropping; new pupillary asymmetry; ONSD continuing to rise despite osmotherapy; TCD PI rising; aEEG losing cycling or new ictal envelope.

When to escalate (when possible):

  • Failure of medical management plus a transferable patient, urgent transfer to centre with invasive monitoring and neurosurgery.
  • Failure plus immediate surgical lesion (haematoma, hydrocephalus) plus on-site theatre, surgery.
  • Failure plus no transfer or surgery available, maximum medical management with documentation.

When to de-escalate:

  • 24 to 48 h of stable or improving exam.
  • ONSD and TCD trending normal.
  • aEEG cycling restored.
  • Source of acute insult under control (antibiotics for infection, oedema resolving, glucose stable).

8. Variant subsections

8.1 Severe TBI in resource-limited PICU

The 2012 BEST-TRIP trial demonstrated that a protocol of imaging plus structured clinical exam was non-inferior to invasive ICP monitoring for moderate to severe TBI in a setting where invasive monitoring was previously rare. This does not mean invasive monitoring is unnecessary in all settings, but it does demonstrate that careful structured care without invasive monitoring is a defensible default in resource-limited contexts. The 2019 PBTF guidelines recommend a tiered approach: clinical and imaging, then invasive when available.

8.2 Meningitis and encephalitis

Bacterial meningitis with cerebral oedema is the classical case for the non-invasive bundle in this setting. Antibiotics, steroids (for pneumococcal), and bedside ONSD plus TCD plus clinical exam guide the early hours. Tuberculous meningitis adds vasculitic vasospasm as a downstream complication; rising TCD MFV with high LR in the second week is the bedside sign.

8.3 DKA cerebral oedema

Pediatric DKA cerebral oedema typically presents 4 to 12 hours into rehydration with progressive headache, lethargy, and (later) pupillary signs. Bedside TCD documenting rising PI before pupillary signs appear is the signature of pre-emptive recognition. The 2018 PECARN DKA fluid trial showed that the rate of clinical brain injury is independent of fluid rate within the protocol range, removing some controversy about rehydration speed.

8.4 Neonatal HIE without aEEG or full cEEG

In a centre with only clinical exam and intermittent EEG, the Sarnat staging plus clinical seizure monitoring are the bedside tools. Active cooling at 33 to 34 C is now standard of care globally and is feasible in resource-limited centres. Fontanelle US for IVH and hydrocephalus. MRI day 4 to 7 for prognosis where available.

8.5 Post-cardiac-arrest in regional PICU

The cooled or recently cooled child is one of the high-yield cEEG indications; in the absence of cEEG, aEEG is the bridge. Clinical exam is unreliable during sedation and cooling. NIRS asymmetry is a useful localising flag. Pupillometry trend is the bedside neurocheck.

8.6 Transfer triggers and stabilisation for transit

In any of the above scenarios, transfer to a tertiary centre is the escalation when bedside management is exhausted. Pre-transfer checklist: secured airway, two-large-bore IV access, mannitol or hypertonic saline drawn up and ready, AED ready, vasopressor available, paramedic crew briefed, receiving centre confirmed, family informed. ONSD and TCD repeated immediately pre-departure for handover trend. CT performed if not already.


9. Multimodal integration matrix

PairWhat you gainWorked scenario
Clinical exam + ONSDCross-validates raised ICP suspicion; ONSD acts as the "extended exam"Amani's meningitis bundle
ONSD + TCD-PITwo independent non-invasive ICP surrogates; concordance increases confidenceChitra, TBI without invasive monitor
Fontanelle US + aEEGAnatomy plus electrical state in the infant; the two infant-specific toolsBashir, neonatal IVH
TCD-PI + NIRSMacrovascular flow plus tissue oxygen; the autoregulation signalPost-DKA child during fluid management
Clinical exam + PupillometryQuantifies the pupil exam that survives inter-rater variabilityRepeated 2-hourly checks
CT + bedside ultrasoundAnatomic snapshot plus continuous bedside trendingThe standard pairing where CT is available

10. Worked alternative scenarios

10.1 What if the ONSD is high but the patient looks well?

A 5-year-old with chronic hydrocephalus on a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, baseline ONSD 5.4, current value 5.6, asymptomatic. The thresholds are not absolute; chronic raised ICP from any cause produces ONSD remodelling and the threshold needs to be patient-relative. Look at the trend (is it rising versus baseline?) and the clinical context (any shunt-failure signs?). A static elevated ONSD in a well child does not require action; a rising trend does.

10.2 What if the TCD probe gives no signal?

In about 10 to 15% of children (more in older girls with thicker temporal bone), the temporal window is poor and the TCD signal is weak or absent. Options: try the contralateral window; try the suboccipital window for basilar (the head will tell you what is happening centrally); try a different position (head-of-bed flat); use the bedside ONSD plus clinical exam plus aEEG without TCD. The bundle is robust to the loss of one modality.

10.3 What if the patient is referred from a centre without imaging?

A 4-year-old with a head injury arrives at the regional PICU with no CT (the referring hospital has none). What is the role of the bedside bundle? ONSD provides a surrogate for raised ICP; if greatly elevated, escalate to imaging at the next-tier centre; if normal, the clinical exam plus bedside trending may allow safe observation while CT is arranged. Fontanelle US in infants. Bedside aEEG for seizure detection. The bundle does not replace CT but bridges the time before it.


11. Outcome data

  • BEST-TRIP (Chesnut 2012): in a Bolivian and Ecuadorian PICU and adult ICU setting, protocol-based management without invasive ICP was non-inferior to invasive ICP-guided care for severe TBI. The result rests on careful clinical and imaging surveillance, not on the conclusion that ICP is unimportant.
  • Hawthorne 2014 review: invasive ICP monitoring availability varies enormously across centres; the question "when does ICP monitoring change management" is highly setting-dependent.
  • Padayachy 2016 paediatric ONSD: thresholds of greater than 5.5 mm (over 1 year) and greater than 5.0 mm (under 1 year) correlate with ICP greater than 20 mmHg with sensitivity 0.85 to 0.95 and specificity 0.7 to 0.85 across paediatric series.
  • Robba 2018 ONSD review: comprehensive review of ONSD in adults and children; recommends ONSD as a useful bedside tool, not a replacement for invasive monitoring.
  • Cardim 2016 nICP review: comparative review of non-invasive ICP estimators (TCD-PI, ONSD, tympanic, NIRS-based); concludes that combinations are more useful than any single modality.
  • Figaji 2025 paediatric MMM consensus: formalises resource-stratified bundles.
  • Helbok 2024 paediatric MMM update: addresses gaps and emerging modalities; emphasises the importance of bedside trending.

12. Pitfalls

  • Treating a single ONSD value as diagnostic. ONSD is a screening tool; the trend matters more. Baseline against the child's earlier scan if available.
  • Believing a normal PI rules out raised ICP. PI is non-specific in both directions. A normal PI with worsening clinical exam needs further investigation.
  • Skipping the structured clinical exam. The bundle is built around the exam, not in place of it. Two hourly GCS, pupil, focal exam is the floor.
  • Using TCD as ICP measurement. The Bellner regression is a triage tool with wide confidence intervals; it is not a replacement for invasive monitoring.
  • Believing imaging alone is the answer. A CT shows the situation at one moment; the bedside bundle shows the trajectory. Both are needed.
  • Delaying transfer. When the bundle indicates deterioration and local resources are exhausted, transfer is the escalation. Pre-arrange transfer pathways with tertiary centres in routine business hours.
  • Forgetting fontanelle examination in infants. A tense, non-pulsatile fontanelle is a reliable sign of raised ICP in infants under 12 to 18 months.
  • Over-interpreting aEEG. Reduced-channel aEEG screens for major patterns (continuity, cycling, prolonged ictal envelopes); it does not diagnose NCSE definitively.

13. Pediatric considerations

In children

The resource-limited paediatric bundle has features distinct from the adult version.

  • Fontanelle ultrasound is available in infants with an open fontanelle (under 12 to 18 months) and gives both anatomy and ICP surrogate.
  • Age-banded ONSD thresholds. Approximately 5.5 mm in school-age children, 4.5 to 5.0 mm in toddlers, 4.0 to 4.5 mm in infants. Sequential trending is more useful than threshold-crossing.
  • TCD MFV age curves. Healthy 4-year-old MFV around 100 cm/s; healthy adult around 55. Reading paediatric TCD with adult thresholds is the single most common error.
  • Weight-banded osmotherapy. Hypertonic saline 3% at 5 mL/kg; mannitol 0.5 g/kg. Repeat dosing every 4 to 6 hours as needed.
  • Family involvement in resource-limited settings. Family members are often the primary observers between formal exams; structured handover at every shift change includes the parents in many LMIC PICUs.
  • Transfer logistics. Pediatric transfer teams may not be available 24/7; planning the transfer pathway during stable hours is essential.
  • Cooling for neonatal HIE is feasible globally with phase-change devices; the Sarnat staging and clinical seizure monitoring are the bedside tools when aEEG is unavailable.

14. Combine with


15. Evidence summary

TopicSourceGrade
BEST-TRIP (TBI without invasive ICP)A
ICP monitoring availability and decisionsreview
Pediatric ONSD thresholdsC
ONSD reviewreview
Pediatric microdialysis (Padayachy 2012)C
Non-invasive ICP review (Cardim 2016)review
Pediatric MMM consensusexpert
Pediatric MMM updatereview
MMM consensus (general)expert
Pediatric severe TBI (PBTF)expert
Bellner PI for ICP estimationC
Meningitis (van de Beek)expert
Encephalitis (Tunkel IDSA)expert
Dexamethasone in meningitisA
DKA (PECARN fluid trial)A
DKA review (Glaser 2024)review
Neonatal cEEG reviewreview
Pediatric pupillometryC
NIRS in acute injuryB

16. Recent literature (2022 to 2025)

  • Figaji 2025 paediatric MMM consensus formalises the resource-stratified bundle: minimum viable to high-resource.
  • Helbok 2024 paediatric MMM update describes emerging bedside tools (handheld TCD, low-cost NIRS, smartphone pupillometry) suitable for resource-limited centres.
  • Cardim 2023 nICP validation continues the Brain4Care work on TCD-derived non-invasive ICP. The current consensus is that nICP is a triage tool, not a replacement.
  • DKA management (Glaser 2024 review) consolidates the PECARN findings: fluid rate within protocol does not change cerebral oedema risk; the risk factor is the severity of presenting acidosis and the patient's age.
  • Pediatric cooling for HIE continues to expand globally; phase-change cooling devices are now affordable for LMIC centres.

17. Self-check

Retrieval check
Amani, 3 y, 13 kg, on day 2 of bacterial meningitis in a regional PICU without invasive ICP. ONSD has gone from 4.6 to 5.4 mm over 4 h. Bedside TCD PI is 1.5 with EDV 18 cm/s. GCS has dropped from 11 to 9. What is the most appropriate action?
In the BEST-TRIP trial, what did the comparison of protocol-based clinical management versus invasive ICP-guided care show for moderate to severe TBI?
Bashir, 6 weeks, presents with tense fontanelle and lethargy. The district hospital has no CT. Bedside fontanelle ultrasound shows ventriculomegaly with a hyperechoic IVH-suggestive lesion. What is the most appropriate immediate action?

References

  1. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  2. Cardim D, Robba C, Bohdanowicz M, et al.. Non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: is it possible?. Neurocritical Care 2016;25:473-491.
  3. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and invasively measured ICP in children. Child's Nervous System 2016;32(10):1779–1785. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3068-4 link
  4. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al.. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition (PBTF/SCCM). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(3S):S1-S82.
  5. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al.. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. NEJM 2012;367(26):2471-2481.
  6. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter and invasive ICP in children. Part I: repeatability, observer variability and general analysis. Childs Nervous System 2016;32(10):1769-1778.
  7. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, et al.. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(8):1284-1294.
  8. Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson KA, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP). Surgical Neurology 2004;62(1):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.007 link
  9. Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al.. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I and II (ACNS). Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2015;32(2-3):87-105 / 96-108.
  10. Davies DJ, Su Z, Clancy MT, et al.. Near-infrared spectroscopy in the monitoring of adult traumatic brain injury: a review. Journal of Neurotrauma 2015;32(13):933-941.
  11. Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, et al.. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study (ORANGE). Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(12):2102-2111.
  12. Brouwer MC, McIntyre P, Prasad K, van de Beek D. Corticosteroids for acute bacterial meningitis (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database 2010.
  13. van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O, et al.. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2016;22 Suppl 3:S37-S62.
  14. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al.. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008;47(3):303-327.
  15. Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
  16. Glaser N, Kuppermann N. Cerebral injury in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis: mechanisms, prevention, and current research. Pediatric Diabetes 2024.
  17. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, et al.. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. NEJM 2005;353(15):1574-1584.
  18. Sansevere AJ, Kapur K, Peters JM, et al.. Continuous EEG in the neonatal ICU: utility in seizure detection and neuroprognostication. Pediatric Neurology 2023.
  19. Topjian AA, Scholefield BR, Pinto NP, et al.. Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation 2021;144(13):e194-e233.
  20. Moler FW, Silverstein FS, Holubkov R, et al.. Therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children (THAPCA-OH). NEJM 2015;372(20):1898-1908.
  21. Hawthorne C, Piper I. Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Neurology 2014;5:121.
  22. Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  23. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al.. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care. Intensive Care Medicine 2014;40(9):1189-1209.
  24. Freeman M, Schober ME. Quantitative pupillometry in pediatric neurocritical care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2020.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.