NI-ICP · NON INVASIVE ICP

Non-invasive ICP estimators

TCD pulsatility, optic nerve sheath diameter, Brain4Care extensometer, tympanic membrane displacement, and the bedside methods that estimate intracranial pressure without drilling a bolt.

PressureBedside + researchPeds + adultNon-invasiveEmerging
CLast reviewed 2026-05-1718-min read

1. Bedside vignettes: why this matters in the PICU

Vignette A. The 10-year-old in a peripheral ED

A 10-year-old presents to a rural ED 90 minutes from the nearest pediatric neurosurgical centre after a bicycle helmet-strike. GCS 11, headache, vomiting, photophobia. The CT shows a small extradural with effacement of the basal cisterns. There is no neurosurgeon, no invasive monitor, and a 90-minute transfer ahead. You scan the left MCA with a 2 MHz probe: PSV 95, EDV 18, PI 1.7. ONSD on the right is 6.2 mm, on the left 6.0 mm. The Bellner regression (ICP ≈ 10.93 × PI − 1.28) returns ICP ≈ 17 mmHg, but the ONSD is significantly above the pediatric cut-off. You treat empirically with 3% saline 3 mL/kg, head up 30°, and accelerate the transfer with a paramedic crew briefed on the working diagnosis.

Vignette B. The 2-month-old with bulging fontanelle on the post-natal ward

A 2-month-old infant is seen on the post-natal ward 6 weeks after discharge with vomiting, poor feeding, and a tense fontanelle. The closest centre with a pediatric neurosurgeon is 4 hours away. There is no CT in the unit. Through-fontanelle ultrasound shows ventriculomegaly. ONSD (still measurable through the open suture but better imaged from the transorbital window): 5.5 mm bilateral, well above the < 1 y cut-off. TCD through the fontanelle: PI 1.8 in the MCA. The combination triggers an immediate phone call to the pediatric neurosurgical service, transfer arranged with hypertonic saline ready, and the infant is in theatre 6 hours later for an EVD.

Vignette C. The adolescent with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and "normal" PI

A 16-year-old with new-onset chronic headaches, papilloedema on fundoscopy, and a normal CT presents for evaluation of IIH. ONSD is 6.3 mm bilaterally. TCD PI is 0.9 (normal). The team is briefly reassured by the PI but the optometry exam, the symptoms, and the ONSD are concordant for raised ICP. PI in chronic, low-grade raised ICP is often normal because the cerebrovascular bed has time to adapt; ONSD is the more sensitive index here. Lumbar puncture confirms opening pressure 32 cmH2O.


2. What NI-ICP is, and what it is not

Invasive ICP measurement (parenchymal Codman / Camino strain gauge probes, intraventricular EVD) is the standard against which all non-invasive methods are validated. The non-invasive methods are estimators: they use a proxy signal (Doppler velocity, optic sheath diameter, tympanic-membrane displacement, skull pulsation amplitude) and convert it via a regression or a waveform-shape algorithm to an estimated ICP.

Three things follow.

Accuracy is method-, age-, and centre-dependent. Most NI-ICP estimators have 95% confidence intervals of ±10 to 15 mmHg around the true ICP. They are sufficient to exclude severe intracranial hypertension with a high NPV (Rasulo's 2022 IMPRESSIT-2 multicentre study: the TCD-derived ICP estimate excludes intracranial hypertension with a high negative predictive value, though with poor quantitative concordance, ~33%) but they are not sufficient to measure ICP in the way an invasive monitor does. They do not let you target a precise CPP.

Trend over absolute. A rising PI from 0.9 to 1.5 within a single child within an hour is a useful signal even when the absolute number is not diagnostic. An ONSD that has grown from 5.0 to 6.0 mm over 12 hours in the same child is more informative than the absolute value. Document with the same probe, same operator where possible.

Multimodal beats single-modality. TCD PI and ONSD together perform better than either alone: PI catches the acute haemodynamic signature of raised ICP; ONSD catches the structural (CSF-pressure) signature. Add fontanelle ultrasound in the infant. Add clinical exam always.

Clinical pearl

NI-ICP is triage, not measurement. Use it to decide whether to place an invasive monitor, transfer to a neurosurgical centre, or initiate empirical treatment. Do not use it to titrate CPP target to within a few mmHg; that requires an invasive probe.

In children

Pediatric NI-ICP is more useful than adult NI-ICP because invasive monitoring decisions are higher-stakes (smaller skulls, longer transfers, anaesthetic risks). ONSD, fontanelle ultrasound, and TCD PI through the (still-thin) pediatric temporal bone are all easier in children. Age-banded ONSD cut-offs are mandatory (5.0 mm in an adult is normal; 5.0 mm in a 6-month-old is clearly abnormal).


3. The methods: anatomy and principle

Fig. 1
NON-INVASIVE ICP: A METHODS COMPARISONwhat each can and cannot tell you · none replaces invasive ICPMETHODREADS (proxy)ACCURACYBEST FORPEDIATRIC CAVEATClinical exam+ pupillometry(NPi)INSENSITIVELOC, headache,vomiting; pupil size+ reactivity (NPi =quantified reactivity)Insensitive.Papilloedema in only~20% of children(Krahulik 2023).Cushing triad = lateherniation sign.Bedside baseline +red flags; NPi trendsevolving herniation.Never an ICP value.Signs late /nonspecific; infantsespecially silent.Anteriorfontanelle(infants)CRUDEFontanelle tensionby palpation (infantonly; closes~18-24 months)Crude, subjective.Bulging suggestsraised ICP but isnonspecific (crying,fever). Soft doesNOT exclude it.Quick infant bedsidesign; neverquantitative.Open fontanelleBUFFERS pressure andcan MASK raised ICP.TCD(PI / derivedICP)RULE-OUT ONLYMCA flow-velocitywaveform; pulsatilityindex; TCD-derivedICP estimatePoor as a number,esp. in children:PI>=1 for ICP>20 hadsens ~25% (Figaji2009). Value isrule-OUT.Rule OUT raised ICP:high NPV for excludingit, but poorconcordance (Rasulo2022, IMPRESSIT-2).Trend, not absolute.PI confounded by manynon-ICP factors;unreliable as aquantitative estimatein children.ONSD(ocularultrasound)BEST ADJUNCTOptic nerve sheathdiameter 3 mm behindthe globe (CSFtransmits ICP tothe sheath)Best non-invasiveaccuracy in children:pooled sens ~92% /spec ~89% (Rajendran2024).Screening: reasonablerule-OUT and rule-IN;serial trend.Open fontanelle ->lower ONSD despiteraised ICP; cutoffsage- AND fontanelle-dependent (Padayachy2016).BEDSIDE FLOWsuspected raised ICP, escalating to the reference standardSuspectraised ICPExam +fontanelle(always;insensitive)ONSD(best screen)+/- TCD(rule-out)Discordance,sustainedconcern, orred flags *ESCALATE TOINVASIVE ICP(referencestandard)* red flags: falling NPi · Cushing triad · deteriorating examInvasive ICP (EVD / intraparenchymal) is the reference standard · MNM-Edu schematic · Krahulik 2023 · Figaji 2009 · Rasulo 2022 · Rajendran 2024 · Padayachy 2016
The four core bedside non-invasive methods compared on what each can and cannot tell you, ordered by accuracy. Clinical exam plus pupillometry (NPi) is insensitive: papilloedema appears in only ~20% of children with raised ICP (Krahulik 2023) and the Cushing triad is a late herniation sign. The anterior fontanelle is a crude infant sign whose open state buffers pressure and can mask raised ICP. TCD pulsatility index is a poor quantitative estimate (sensitivity ~25% in children, Figaji 2009) and is useful mainly to rule raised ICP out (a high negative predictive value, but poor quantitative concordance; Rasulo 2022, IMPRESSIT-2). ONSD has the best non-invasive accuracy in children (pooled sensitivity ~92% / specificity ~89%, Rajendran 2024) but its cutoffs are age- and fontanelle-dependent (Padayachy 2016). The bedside flow runs clinical exam and fontanelle, then ONSD plus or minus TCD, then escalation to invasive ICP. None of these methods replaces invasive ICP measurement, the reference standard.
MNM-Edu, original schematic. Krahulik 2023, Figaji 2009, Rasulo 2022, Rajendran 2024, Padayachy 2016.

3.1 TCD pulsatility index (PI)

PI = (PSV − EDV) / MFV. Rises when distal cerebrovascular resistance rises, including from raised ICP. The Bellner 2004 regression in 81 neurosurgical patients:

ICP10.93PI1.28\mathrm{ICP} \approx 10.93 \cdot \mathrm{PI} - 1.28

with 95% CI ±10 to 12 mmHg around the predicted value. The TCD-derived ICP estimate has a high NPV for excluding severe intracranial hypertension but poor quantitative concordance with invasive ICP (~33%), so it rules raised ICP out rather than measuring it; the PPV for diagnosing raised ICP is poor (~0.50). In children specifically, a PI threshold of 1 detected only ~25% of cases with ICP > 20 mmHg (sensitivity ~25%, specificity ~88%), so PI is unreliable as a pediatric ICP estimate.

Strengths: bedside, fast, available wherever there is a TCD probe. Limitations: PI rises with anything that increases distal resistance (hypocapnia, hyperoxia, hypothermia, low arterial compliance in neonates), not only ICP.

3.2 Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)

The optic nerve is surrounded by a subarachnoid sheath continuous with the intracranial subarachnoid space. CSF pressure transmitted along this sheath distends it. Measurement: 7 to 12 MHz linear probe over a closed eyelid; identify the optic nerve as a hypoechoic stripe posterior to the globe; measure the sheath outer-to-outer diameter at exactly 3 mm posterior to the retinal surface. Both eyes; take the average of two readings per side.

Age-banded cut-offs:

AgeONSD threshold (mm)Source
< 1 year~4.0Padayachy 2016, Robba 2018
1 to 15 years~4.5Padayachy 2016
Adult~5.0 to 5.7 (varies by ethnicity, sex)Geeraerts 2008, Robba 2018

Strengths: bedside, repeatable, inexpensive, validated against invasive ICP with sensitivity ~85% and specificity ~75% at the appropriate age-banded threshold; a pediatric meta-analysis reports higher pooled accuracy (sensitivity ~92%, specificity ~89%). Limitations: operator-dependent (intra-rater variability up to ±0.3 mm); ethnic and sex variation; not real-time (lag of minutes-to-hours behind acute ICP changes); falsely elevated in optic neuritis, Graves' orbitopathy, and post-orbital trauma.

3.3 Brain4Care extensometer

A scalp-applied strain gauge that measures skull pulsation amplitude with each cardiac cycle. The recorded waveform has the same P1-P2-P3 morphology as the invasive ICP waveform. The ratio P2/P1 rises with falling intracranial compliance (the same physiology that drives the invasive ICP-waveform abnormality). The device returns a non-invasive ICP waveform "shape" rather than an absolute number, and a derived P2/P1 ratio. Validation studies are ongoing.

Strengths: continuous, true waveform analysis, no skull penetration. Limitations: still emerging clinical evidence; sensitive to scalp contact and probe position; the absolute pressure derivation is less robust than the waveform shape.

3.4 Tympanic membrane displacement (TMD)

The perilymph in the cochlea is continuous with the CSF via the cochlear aqueduct, so perilymph pressure tracks ICP. The stapedial reflex causes a small TM displacement whose amplitude varies with perilymph pressure. Method: sealed ear-probe, acoustic stimulus elicits stapedial reflex, the device measures TM displacement to ~0.1 nm resolution. Promising in posture-change ICP changes; less established for absolute ICP. Strengths: continuous, painless. Limitations: requires intact TM and middle ear; cochlear aqueduct closure with age (~50% of adults have closed aqueducts) limits applicability.

3.5 Two-depth TCD (Vittamed)

A specialised TCD that measures simultaneously at two depths (intracranial and extracranial portions of the ophthalmic artery), inferring the pressure gradient across the orbit and hence ICP. Requires a calibrated external pressure cuff over the orbit. Strengths: directly calibrated, less regression-dependent than PI. Limitations: device cost, operator training, limited availability.

3.6 MRI / CT-based volumetric estimators

Quantitative CSF flow MRI (phase-contrast at the aqueduct), ventricular volume change with posture (MRI), CT-based volumetric techniques. Research tools mostly; not bedside.

3.7 Other methods

  • Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) for ICP-related cochlear pressure changes (research).
  • Pupillometry indirectly: a falling NPi is consistent with raised ICP but is not a measurement; the NPi quantifies the pupillary light reflex for trend-following.
  • Fundoscopy / papilloedema: late, chronic sign of raised ICP; useful for the IIH and chronic-ICP context but not acute. Papilloedema is present in only ~20% of children with raised ICP, so its absence does not exclude raised ICP.

4. The signal: what to record at the bedside

MethodWhat you recordFrequency
TCD PIPSV, EDV, MFV, PI; both sides; vessel (typically MCA)Q1 to Q4 hour in acute brain injury
ONSDDiameter (mm) at 3 mm posterior to globe; both eyes; average of 2 readings per sideQ4 to Q6 hour; or single-shot for triage
B4CContinuous waveform; P2/P1 ratio; flag direction of changeContinuous when available
TMDSingle-point amplitude; trend if continuous probe in placeVariable
2D-TCDCalibrated ICP estimate; needs trained operatorSingle-shot per session

Document the operator (intra-rater consistency matters), the probe (for repeat ONSD), and the patient state (head position, sedation, PaCO2).


5. What is normal? Age-banded reference values

AgeTCD PI (typical)ONSD (typical, mm)Note
Term newborn0.7 to 1.0 (anterior fontanelle window)3.5 to 4.0Wide normal range; fontanelle US adds context
1 to 12 months0.8 to 1.13.8 to 4.2Use age-banded cut-off
1 to 5 years0.7 to 1.04.0 to 4.5Use ONSD > 4.5 as concerning
6 to 12 years0.7 to 1.04.2 to 4.7Trend within child
13 to 18 years0.7 to 1.14.5 to 5.0Adult-like by mid-teens
Adult0.7 to 1.15.0 to 5.7Varies by sex / ethnicity

.

In children

ONSD reads normal much earlier in childhood because the sheath has not yet reached adult diameter. A child's ONSD of 5.5 mm is unequivocally raised, where the same value in an adult is borderline. Always reach for the age-band table before interpreting a single number.


6. What is abnormal? Pattern library and method comparison

Fig. 2
NON-INVASIVE ICP PATTERN LIBRARYeach method has a normal and a raised-ICP profile; converging abnormal signs trigger escalation(a) TCD spectral envelopePI ~0.8 (intact EDV)PI ~1.7 (low EDV)normal vs raised-ICP pattern(b) ONSD ultrasound4.0 mm (normal)6.5 mm (distended)sheath measured 3 mm behind the globe(c) Brain4Care pulseP1 > P2 (compliant)P2 > P1 (low compliance)ICP pulse morphology, non-invasive(d) Composite triage (10-year-old)TCD PI1.7ONSD6.5 mmB4C P2/P11.5All three converge: raised ICP likely. Place an invasivemonitor, or give hyperosmolar therapy with imaging.MNM-Edu schematic · waveform shapes are schematic, not live data
Side-by-side comparison of NI-ICP method profiles. (a) TCD spectral envelope: low PI (~0.8) with intact diastolic flow vs high PI (~1.7) with reduced EDV (raised ICP pattern). (b) ONSD ultrasound: 4.0 mm normal sheath vs 6.5 mm distended sheath. (c) Brain4Care: P1 > P2 (compliant) vs P2 > P1 (low compliance). (d) Composite triage table: in a 10-year-old, PI 1.7 + ONSD 6.5 mm + B4C P2/P1 1.5 strongly suggests raised ICP and triggers invasive monitor placement or hyperosmolar therapy with imaging.
MNM-Edu, original schematic.
Method"Normal" reading"Worrying" reading"Strongly abnormal" reading
TCD PI< 1.01.0 to 1.4> 1.4 with low EDV
ONSD (1 to 15 y)≤ 4.5 mm4.5 to 5.0 mm> 5.0 mm
ONSD (< 1 y)≤ 4.0 mm4.0 to 4.5 mm> 4.5 mm
B4C P2/P1< 1.01.0 to 1.2> 1.2
Composite (any two abnormal)n/aTreat empirically, consider escalationTreat and escalate now

Decision tree: "should I act?"

Clinical pearl

Two abnormal estimators trump one for triage. PI > 1.4 with ONSD above the age-banded cut-off is high-confidence raised ICP and should drive empirical osmotherapy, head-of-bed positioning, and either invasive monitor placement or transfer to a centre that can place one.


7. Try it: interactive widgets

NonInvasiveICPDemo
Loading widget…
ONSDDemo
Loading widget…

8. Management decisions driven by NI-ICP

NI-ICP does not titrate CPP. It triggers escalation decisions: empirical treatment, invasive monitor placement, neurosurgical transfer.

8.1 The triage ladder

  1. Both estimators normal + reassuring exam: continue observation, repeat at planned interval.
  2. One estimator abnormal: empirical head-of-bed, normocapnia, normothermia; recheck both in 1 h.
  3. Both estimators abnormal OR rapid trend change: empirical hypertonic saline or mannitol; arrange CT or repeat imaging; consider invasive monitor placement; involve neurosurgery.
  4. Both estimators strongly abnormal + clinical deterioration: full empirical treatment (osmotherapy, head up, sedation, normocapnia); transfer for invasive monitoring and definitive care.

8.2 Empirical osmotherapy thresholds

A child with PI > 1.4, ONSD above the age cut-off, and a GCS that has fallen by 2 points warrants empirical hypertonic saline 3% at 3 mL/kg over 15 minutes. The pediatric BTF guidance accepts empirical osmotherapy when invasive monitoring is delayed and clinical signs concur.

8.3 Transfer decisions

In a peripheral ED, a child with concordant NI-ICP abnormalities and concerning imaging is a high-priority transfer to a neurosurgical centre. The NI-ICP estimators help in the transfer briefing: "PI 1.7 bilateral, ONSD 6.5 mm bilateral, treated with 3% saline; ICP probably 25 to 35 in our estimation; ETA your unit 60 minutes."

8.4 Centre comparison

In centres without invasive monitoring capability, NI-ICP estimators (especially the TCD-ONSD pairing) are the de facto monitoring standard. The pediatric MMM consensus places them as a tier-2 modality in resource-stratified settings.

Caveat

Teaching, not protocol. Every NI-ICP threshold on this page (PI 1.4, ONSD age-banded values, P2/P1 1.2) is a teaching heuristic. Local validation, age-banded normative data, and clinical correlation always supersede a single number from a non-invasive estimator. Pair with clinical exam and senior neurosurgical input for management decisions.

Educational algorithm, not a clinical protocol. This walkthrough is a teaching aid. Defer to your unit's pediatric protocols, current PBTF / Kochanek / local guidelines, and your senior clinical team. Doses, thresholds, and decision points are starting points, not prescriptions.

9. Clinical contexts: NI-ICP across acute brain injuries

9.1 Severe TBI in resource-limited or pre-transfer settings

The most common use case. Pre-hospital and emergency-department NI-ICP (TCD PI + ONSD) identifies children whose intracranial pressure is likely elevated enough to merit empirical treatment and rapid neurosurgical referral. Tazarourte's 2011 cohort and Bouzat's 2014 study showed pre-hospital TCD PI predicts in-hospital ICU outcome.

9.2 Aneurysmal SAH

Post-SAH hydrocephalus and vasospasm both raise ICP. NI-ICP estimators can monitor between formal CT scans, especially in children where serial CT carries cumulative radiation risk. PI rises with vasospasm independently of ICP, complicating interpretation; ONSD is the cleaner ICP signal in this context.

9.3 Pediatric AIS with malignant oedema

A child with a large MCA infarct can develop malignant oedema 2 to 5 days post-stroke. NI-ICP estimators triage the decision for decompressive hemicraniectomy: rising PI, expanding ONSD, and exam deterioration together justify operative intervention even without a pre-existing ICP probe.

9.4 HIE and post-cardiac arrest

Diffuse cerebral oedema in severe HIE raises ICP, sometimes profoundly. NI-ICP estimators inform decisions about head positioning, mild hyperventilation as a temporising measure, and consideration of EVD placement in selected cases. ONSD is easier than TCD in the chubby neonatal scalp; fontanelle ultrasound adds a third dimension in infants.

9.5 Pediatric ECMO

Daily ONSD on VA-ECMO is part of some units' neurological surveillance bundles. A rising ONSD over 24 hours in a comatose ECMO patient triggers head CT or fontanelle ultrasound (in infants). The non-pulsatile circulation of full-flow ECMO makes TCD PI less useful (PI falls toward zero when pulsatility is lost).

9.6 Meningitis and encephalitis

A child with bacterial meningitis and a tense fontanelle (infant) or evolving GCS depression (older child) warrants ONSD and TCD as part of the empirical raised-ICP workup. Cerebral oedema in fulminant meningitis can necessitate EVD placement; the NI-ICP signals support the decision when imaging cannot be obtained quickly.

9.7 Brain-death determination

NI-ICP estimators are not part of formal brain-death protocols. TCD waveform analysis (oscillating / pendular / systolic-spike-only patterns) is a recognised ancillary test in some jurisdictions. ONSD is not used for brain death.

9.8 DKA cerebral oedema

In a child being rehydrated for DKA, ONSD measurements during the high-risk window (hours 4 to 24 of treatment) can detect early oedema. Rising ONSD beyond the age cut-off in a symptomatic child warrants immediate osmotherapy. PI is less reliable here because hyperglycaemia and rehydration alter cerebral haemodynamics.

9.9 Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

ONSD is the NI-ICP of choice in chronic IIH because TCD PI is often normal (cerebrovascular adaptation). Serial ONSD complements fundoscopy and LP opening pressure in the long-term monitoring of IIH treatment response.


10. Multimodal integration: NI-ICP in the MMM/MNM stack

Pair with…What you gainWorked scenario
Clinical examConcordant exam + NI-ICP findings raise confidenceTBI: falling GCS + rising PI + expanding ONSD = triage now
Pupillometry (NPi)NPi catches CN III early; PI catches ICP earlyTBI: NPi falling on one side + PI rising bilaterally
CT / MRI imagingNI-ICP triggers imaging; imaging refinesRising PI in DKA → CT confirms oedema
Invasive ICP (when subsequently placed)Calibrate NI-ICP estimators to truthCentre validation study
TCD beyond PILindegaard, Mx, full TCD contextTBI with rising PI + Mx +0.5 = ICP up and autoregulation broken
Fontanelle ultrasound (infants)Direct view of ventricles and oedemaBulging fontanelle + ONSD 5.5 + ventriculomegaly = EVD
NIRSMicrovascular oxygenation contextSepsis with rising PI but stable rSO2 = haemodynamic, not perfusion failure

11. Setup and technique

11.1 TCD PI measurement

  1. Probe: 2 MHz pulsed-wave (blind TCD) or 2 to 4 MHz TCCD with B-mode.
  2. Position: temporal window, depth 30 to 50 mm depending on age, MCA M1 segment.
  3. Optimise: angle < 30°, loud crisp spectral envelope, gain set so the envelope is bright without saturation.
  4. Sample: average PSV, EDV, MFV over ≥ 5 cardiac cycles per side.
  5. Compute: PI = (PSV − EDV) / MFV.
  6. Apply Bellner regression: ICP ≈ 10.93 × PI − 1.28 (95% CI ±10 to 12 mmHg).
  7. Document trend: serial measurements every 1 to 4 hours.

11.2 ONSD measurement

  1. Probe: 7 to 12 MHz linear ultrasound probe (the same probe used for vascular access).
  2. Position: patient supine, gentle eye-closure, generous gel cushion to minimise globe pressure.
  3. Image: hypoechoic optic nerve in long axis behind the globe.
  4. Measure: outer-sheath to outer-sheath diameter exactly 3 mm posterior to the retinal surface.
  5. Average: two measurements per side, average across sides if symmetric, or report each side.
  6. Apply age-banded cut-off: < 1 y ~4.0 mm; 1 to 15 y ~4.5 mm; adult ~5.0 to 5.7 mm.
  7. Be gentle: do not press on the globe; pseudo-elevation from probe pressure is a real artefact.

11.3 B4C setup

  1. Skin preparation: clean a small area of parietal scalp; the device contacts the skull directly.
  2. Device placement: secure with the manufacturer's headband; check signal quality on the device screen.
  3. Calibrate: per device protocol (may include zero reference to baseline period).
  4. Record: continuous waveform; the device reports P1, P2, P3 amplitudes and the P2/P1 ratio.
  5. Trend: monitor P2/P1 trajectory over hours; rising P2/P1 ratio = falling compliance, even when absolute pressure is unclear.

11.4 TMD setup

  1. Insert sealed ear-probe in the external auditory canal, ensure tight seal.
  2. Acoustic stimulus triggers stapedial reflex.
  3. Measure TM displacement amplitude.
  4. Interpret per device protocol (research / specialty centres mainly).

11.5 Two-depth TCD (Vittamed)

  1. Position the device at the orbital window with the calibrated external pressure cuff.
  2. Inflate cuff in steps; the device measures velocity in the intracranial and extracranial ophthalmic artery segments simultaneously.
  3. The cuff pressure at which the two velocity envelopes match is the ICP estimate (the "pressure balance point").
  4. Report with confidence interval; requires trained operator.

11.6 Quality control

  • Operator training is the single biggest determinant of NI-ICP accuracy. Maintain a small group of trained operators per unit.
  • Local validation against any invasive ICP placements in your centre over time refines local cut-offs.
  • Inter-observer agreement studies are part of any NI-ICP programme; intra-class correlation > 0.8 is the goal.

12. Pitfalls

  • PI is not ICP. PI rises with hypocapnia, hyperoxia, hypothermia, vasoconstrictors, neonatal low arterial compliance, and many other things. Always interpret in context.
  • ONSD probe pressure artefact. Pressing the probe on the globe transiently raises measured sheath diameter; use generous gel and minimal pressure.
  • ONSD inter-rater variability up to ±0.3 mm; significant when the action threshold is 4.5 mm in a child.
  • B4C absolute pressure is less reliable than the waveform shape; trend P2/P1, not the inferred mmHg.
  • TMD requires intact TM and patent cochlear aqueduct; ~50% of adults have closed aqueducts.
  • Two-depth TCD requires expensive specialised equipment and a trained operator.
  • Chronic raised ICP (IIH) has normal PI because of vascular adaptation; ONSD is the better signal here.
  • VA-ECMO removes pulsatility; PI falls toward zero regardless of ICP.
  • In an infant, the open fontanelle vents ICP partially; ONSD remains useful but interpret with the fontanelle ultrasound context.
  • Single-estimator triage: never make a treatment decision on one estimator alone; always combine.
  • Sedation effect on PI: deep sedation lowers MFV (CMRO2 effect) but does not change PI much; light sedation can produce sympathetic surges that raise PI without raising ICP.

13. Combine with…


14. Evidence summary

TopicSourceGrade
Bellner PI-ICP regression C
Helmke ONSD originalC
Geeraerts ONSD adult validationB
Pediatric ONSD cut-offs B
ONSD systematic reviewA
NI-ICP comprehensive reviewreview
TCD waveform analysis (B4C) B/C
Rasulo 2022 TCD rule-out (IMPRESSIT-2)B
Two-depth TCD ICP estimatorC
PI is not ICP reviewreview
Multicentre NI-ICP validationB
Pediatric MMM consensus expert
Pre-hospital TCD in TBI B
Robba pediatric NI-ICP C
Brain-death TCDexpert

15. Recent literature (2022 to 2025)

  • Brasil 2022: TCD waveform analysis for non-invasive ICP via Brain4Care-style extensometers; transition from research to bedside.
  • Cardim 2023: multicentre validation of non-invasive ICP estimators against parenchymal probes.
  • Rasulo 2022 (IMPRESSIT-2): multicentre study showing TCD reliably excludes intracranial hypertension (high NPV) but with poor quantitative concordance with invasive ICP. Rasulo 2024: Brain4Care P2/P1 ratio correlates with invasive ICP in adult TBI; pediatric data emerging.
  • Figaji 2025 pediatric MMM consensus: positions NI-ICP estimators as tier-2 modalities in resource-stratified pediatric centres.
  • Robotic / continuous TCD platforms: enable continuous PI monitoring without operator presence; relevant for trend-based NI-ICP triage.
  • ONSD pediatric updates: post-2020 pediatric data continue to support the 4.5 mm threshold in 1 to 15 y children, with some centres advocating ethnicity-adjusted cut-offs.

16. Self-check

Retrieval check
A 4-year-old in a rural ED 90 min from the nearest pediatric neurosurgical centre, GCS 11, CT shows a small EDH with effacement of basal cisterns. TCD MCA: PI 1.6, EDV 12 cm/s. ONSD 6.0 mm bilaterally. Most appropriate management?
A 16-year-old presents with chronic headache, papilloedema on fundoscopy, normal CT, normal MR venogram. TCD PI 0.9; ONSD 6.2 mm bilaterally. Best interpretation?
A 7-year-old with severe TBI now on VA-ECMO for refractory shock. The ICP monitor is contraindicated by the systemic anticoagulation strategy. You attempt TCD: PSV 30, EDV 25, MFV 28, PI 0.18. The PI is "normal." Best interpretation?

References

  1. Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson KA, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP). Surgical Neurology 2004;62(1):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.007 link
  2. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter and invasive ICP in children. Part I: repeatability, observer variability and general analysis. Childs Nervous System 2016;32(10):1769-1778.
  3. Cardim D, Robba C, Bohdanowicz M, et al.. Non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: is it possible?. Neurocritical Care 2016;25:473-491.
  4. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, et al.. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine 2018;44(8):1284-1294.
  5. Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Pulsatility-based and waveform-derived ICP estimation: review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2012;367(1601):2356–2367. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0382 link
  6. Rasulo FA, Calza S, Robba C, et al.. Transcranial Doppler as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: the IMPRESSIT-2 prospective multicenter international study. Critical Care 2022;26(1):110. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03978-2 link
  7. Robba C, Bacigaluppi S, Cardim D, et al.. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2017;134(1):4–21.
  8. Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson K-A, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index correlates with intracranial pressure. Surgical Neurology 2004;62(1):45–51.
  9. de Riva N, Budohoski KP, Smielewski P, et al.. Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: what it is and what it is not. Neurocritical Care 2012;17(1):58-66.
  10. Figaji AA, Zwane E, Fieggen AG, Siesjö P, Peter JC. Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index is not a reliable indicator of intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Surgical Neurology 2009;72(4):389-394. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.012 link
  11. Geeraerts T, Newcombe VFJ, Coles JP, et al.. Use of T2-weighted MRI of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure. Critical Care 2008;12(5):R114. doi:10.1186/cc7006 link
  12. Helmke K, Hansen H-C. Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. I. Experimental study. Pediatric Radiology 1996;26(10):701–705. doi:10.1007/BF01383384 link
  13. Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG. The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and invasively measured ICP in children. Child's Nervous System 2016;32(10):1779–1785. doi:10.1007/s00381-016-3068-4 link
  14. Rajendran G, Mahalingam S, Ramkumar A, et al.. Diagnostic Accuracy of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Using Ultrasonography for Raised Intracranial Pressure in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery 2024;190:e1000-e1017. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.052 link
  15. Rasulo FA, Brasil S, Andrade R, Robba C. Non-invasive ICP estimation by Brain4Care: prospective validation across centers. Neurocritical Care 2024.
  16. Brasil S, Solla DJF, Nogueira RC, Teixeira MJ, Malbouisson LMS, Paiva WS. Intracranial compliance and cerebral perfusion: novel non-invasive assessment using waveform analysis. Brain Sciences 2022;12(11):1559.
  17. Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Schwarze JJ, et al.. Cerebral vasodilatation causing acute intracranial hypertension: a method for noninvasive assessment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1997;19(4):423–429.
  18. Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S, Bullock RM. Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure. Surgical Neurology International 2011;2:82. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.82248 link
  19. Krahulik D, Hrabalek L, Blazek F, et al.. Sensitivity of Papilledema as a Sign of Increased Intracranial Pressure. Children (Basel) 2023;10(4):723. doi:10.3390/children10040723 link
  20. Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, et al.. Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition (PBTF/SCCM). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(3S):S1-S82.
  21. Figaji AA, Tasker RC, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM. Pediatric multimodal monitoring consensus update, practical algorithms for resource-stratified centers. Intensive Care Medicine, Paediatric and Neonatal 2025.
  22. Helbok R, Tasker RC, Kochanek PM, Bell MJ. Pediatric multimodal monitoring: where are we and where do we go?. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  23. Tazarourte K, Atchabahian A, Tourtier JP, et al.. Pre-hospital transcranial Doppler in severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2011;55(4):422-428.
  24. Bouzat P, Almeras L, Manhes P, et al.. Transcranial Doppler to predict neurologic outcome after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. Anesthesiology 2016;125(2):346-354.
  25. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al.. Guideline for the management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023;54(7):e314-e370.
  26. Rass V, Helbok R. How to diagnose delayed cerebral ischaemia and symptomatic vasospasm and prevent cerebral infarction in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2021;27(2):103-114.
  27. Ferriero DM, Fullerton HJ, Bernard TJ, et al.. Management of stroke in neonates and children: a scientific statement from the AHA/ASA. Stroke 2019;50(3):e51-e96.
  28. Topjian AA, Scholefield BR, Pinto NP, et al.. Pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation 2021;144(13):e194-e233.
  29. Naim MY, Friess SH, Sutton RM, et al.. Multimodal neuromonitoring in pediatric post-cardiac-arrest care. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  30. Lorusso R, Taccone FS, Belliato M, et al.. Brain monitoring in adult and pediatric ECMO patients: the importance of early and late assessments. Minerva Anestesiologica 2017;83(10):1061-1074.
  31. Cho SM, Ziai W, Geocadin R, et al.. Cerebrovascular events in ECMO survivors: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Critical Care Medicine 2024.
  32. Tunkel AR, Glaser CA, Bloch KC, et al.. The management of encephalitis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008;47(3):303-327.
  33. van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O, et al.. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2016;22 Suppl 3:S37-S62.
  34. Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, et al.. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Critical Care Medicine 2011;39(9):2139-2155.
  35. Rasulo FA, De Peri E, Lavinio A. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in intensive care. European Journal of Anaesthesiology Supplement 2008;25:167–173. doi:10.1017/S0265021507003341 link
  36. Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, et al.. Clinical trial of fluid infusion rates for pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (PECARN FLUID). NEJM 2018;378(24):2275-2287.
  37. Glaser N, Kuppermann N. Cerebral injury in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis: mechanisms, prevention, and current research. Pediatric Diabetes 2024.
  38. Tasker RC, LaRovere KL, Riviello JJ, et al.. Pediatric multimodal neuromonitoring: international Delphi consensus. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2023.
  39. Cardim D, Robba C, Czosnyka M, et al.. Non-invasive ICP estimation: an updated review. J Clin Monit Comput 2023.
  40. Robba C, et al.. Optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound in pediatric patients. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2018.

MNM-Edu uses Google Analytics for visitor statistics. Analytics will only load if you accept. See the privacy policy for what it collects and how to withdraw consent later.